My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISTOPHER
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523929
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2019 10:47:55 AM
Creation date
5/30/2019 10:22:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523929
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016100
FACILITY_NAME
WRP #1/ CITY OF LATHROP
STREET_NUMBER
18800
STREET_NAME
CHRISTOPHER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19813035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18800 CHRISTOPHER WAY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION SHEET -6- <br /> CITY OF LATHROP AND METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY NO. 1 (CROSSROADS) <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Treatment and storage facilities for sludge that are part of the WWTF are considered exempt from <br /> Title 27 under section 20090(a), under the condition that the facilities not result in a violation of any <br /> water quality objective. However, residual sludge (for the purposes of the proposed order, sludge that <br /> will not be subjected to further treatment by the WWTF) is not exempt from Title 27. Solid waste (e.g., <br /> grit and screenings) that results from treatment of domestic sewage and industrial waste also is not <br /> exempt from Title 27. This residual sludge and solid waste are subject to the provisions of Title 27. <br /> Accordingly, the municipal discharge of effluent and the operation of treatment or storage facilities <br /> associated with a municipal wastewater treatment plant can be allowed without requiring compliance <br /> with Title 27, but only if resulting degradation of groundwater is in accordance with the Basin Plan. <br /> This means, among other things, degradation of groundwater must be consistent with Resolution 68-16 <br /> and in no case greater than water quality objectives. The conditions for sludge, solid waste, and <br /> biosolids management proposed in this Order are intended to assure this and must all be evaluated along <br /> with other aspects of BPTC. <br /> Proposed Order Terms and Conditions <br /> Discharge Prohibitions and Specifications <br /> The proposed Order establishes a discharge flow limit of 250,000 gpd. The proposed Order's discharge <br /> specifications for BODS and TSS are based on the treatment technologies employed. The proposed <br /> Order does not require the Discharger to disinfect effluent at this time. The discharge specifications <br /> regarding dissolved oxygen and freeboard are consistent with Board policy for the prevention of <br /> nuisance conditions, and are applied to all such facilities. <br /> In order to protect public health and safety, the proposed Order requires the Discharger to comply with <br /> many of the provisions of Title 22 and to implement best management practices with respect to effluent <br /> disposal (e.g., to dispose of effluent at reasonable rates considering the crop, soil, climate, and irrigation <br /> management plan.). <br /> Monitoring Requirements <br /> Section 13267 of the CWC authorizes the Board to require monitoring and technical reports as necessary <br /> to investigate the impact of a waste discharge on waters of the state. In recent years there has been <br /> increased emphasis on obtaining all necessary information, assuring the information is timely as well as <br /> representative and accurate, and thereby improving accountability of any discharger for meeting the <br /> conditions of discharge. Section 13268 of the CWC authorizes assessment civil administrative liability <br /> where appropriate. <br /> The proposed Order increases the previous Order's influent and effluent monitoring requirements, and <br /> includes flow rates, wastewater storage ponds, disposal areas, and groundwater monitoring requirements. <br /> In order to adequately characterize its wastewater effluent, the Discharger is required to monitor for <br /> settleable solids, BOD, coliform, TDS, nitrogen, sodium, and chloride. Monitoring of additional <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.