Laserfiche WebLink
D R A F T January 4, 2012 <br /> STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br /> STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD <br /> ORDER WQ 2009-0005 <br /> As Amended' by <br /> ORDER WQ 2012-XXXX <br /> In the Matter of Own Motion Review of <br /> CITY OF LODI WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS AND MASTER RECLAMATION <br /> PERMIT (ORDER NO. R5-2007-0113 [NPDES NO. CA0079243]) <br /> Issued by the <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board, <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> SWRCB/OCC FILE A-1886 <br /> BY THE BOARD: <br /> In this order, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board or <br /> Board) reviews on its own motion waste discharge requirements for the City of Lodi's White <br /> Slough Water Pollution Control Facility. Our review focuses primarily on whether the <br /> requirements are consistent with State Water Board regulations governing waste disposal to <br /> land. These regulations are contained in title 27 of the California Code of Regulations <br /> (Title 27). The Board concludes that the requirements are not consistent with Title 27 and <br /> remands the requirements to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Central <br /> Valley Water Board) for appropriate revisions. In addition, the Board remands the requirements <br /> to the Central Valley Water Board to revise a requirement governing wintertime irrigation and to <br /> include a narrative limitation for chronic toxicity. <br /> ' Following adoption of Order WQ 2009-0005 the Central Valley Clean Water Association Detitioned the San <br /> Joaquin Superior Court for a writ of mandate invalidating Order WQ 2009-0005 In response the State Water <br /> Resources Control Board has reconsidered the applicability of the sewage treatment plant exemption (Cal Code <br /> Regs.,tit. 27, §20090, subd. (a)) to post-treatment storage facilities In this Order, the State Water Resources <br /> Control Board amends Order WQ 2009-0005 to reflect the terms of the sewage treatment plant exemption This <br /> amendment does not result in any change to the conclusions of Order WO 2009-0005 <br />