Laserfiche WebLink
Beneath the WWTF, water levels in the nine WWTF monitoring wells increased by <br /> an average of about 0.5 feet between First Quarter 2010 and Second Quarter <br /> 2010. Groundwater elevation contours indicate horizontal groundwater movement <br /> is generally to the west and southwest beneath the Land Application Sites and to <br /> the north and northwest beneath the storage ponds. Groundwater flow directions <br /> are generally similar to flow directions observed during previous monitoring <br /> events. The calculated gradient between paired wells was 0.0013 beneath the <br /> Land Application Sites and was 0.0030 beneath the storage ponds (Table 5). <br /> Gradients beneath both the Land Application Sites and the storage ponds <br /> increased relative the First Quarter 2010. <br /> 3.2 Groundwater Analytical Results and Interim Limitations <br /> Table 6 shows groundwater sampling results for all constituents analyzed, and <br /> Figure 4 presents box plots (stem and whisker diagrams) that concisely display <br /> the data distributions for the pooled Crossroads site monitoring wells. In the <br /> Lathrop area, observed background groundwater quality exhibits substantial <br /> spatial and temporal variability and background concentrations typically exceed <br /> interim limitations.4 In a report submitted to the RWQCB in 2003, background <br /> groundwater quality was tabulated and statistical analyses employed to <br /> recommend final groundwater quality limitations for the Crossroads site.5 <br /> Subsequently, Lathrop's "Best Practical Treatment and Control Evaluation Work <br /> Plan" (BPTC Workplan) submitted to the RWQCB in 2005 concluded that the <br /> final limitations recommended in 2003 may not be appropriate.6 The 2005 BPTC <br /> Workplan included data suggesting groundwater quality beneath Crossroads <br /> Land Application Sites likely exceeded the 2003 recommended limits prior to <br /> disposal of recycled water. The BPTC Workplan therefore recommended further <br /> study to better understand background groundwater quality beneath the <br /> Crossroads site. This additional study has not yet been performed pending <br /> RWQCB concurrence with the BPTC Workplan conclusions. <br /> As required by the WDRs, the Second Quarter 2010 data are compared to the <br /> interim limitations (Table 6). Concentrations of TDS, sodium, and chloride in all <br /> the monitoring wells exceeded interim groundwater limitations. However, as <br /> described in the BPTC Workplan, the TDS, chloride, and sodium concentrations in <br /> all wells exceeded interim groundwater limitations prior to the application of <br /> wastewater on the Land Application Sites. Therefore, the current TDS, sodium, <br /> and chloride concentration exceedances are likely due, at least partially, to <br /> background groundwater quality conditions. <br /> 4 City of Lathrop, Background Groundwater Quality Study Report, Membrane Bioreactor <br /> Wastewater Recycling Plant, Order No. R5-2006-0094 February 27, 2009, HydroFocus, Inc. <br /> 5 City of Lathrop Water Recycling Plant No. 1, Background Groundwater Quality Study Report, <br /> November, 2003, Nolte Associates, Inc. <br /> 6 City of Lathrop Water Recycling Plant No. 1, Best Practical Treatment and Control Evaluation <br /> Workplan, January 2005, Nolte Associates, Inc. <br /> - 11 - <br />