My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHURCH
>
800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516614
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2019 3:47:47 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 3:21:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516614
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0012708
FACILITY_NAME
NEWARK SIERRA PAPERBOARD/ RECYCLING
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHURCH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14523004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
800 W CHURCH ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 4 <br /> from full submittal (all complete and accurate info) to drill date is the bare bones, absolute quickest <br /> turnaround time available...and ONLY if all is correct.... <br /> mike. <br /> since you paid <br /> From:JLanzon@Geosyntec.com [mailto:JLanzon@Geosyntec.com] <br /> Sent:Tuesday,January 25, 20119:35 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 800 West Church Street-boring permit <br /> Mike, <br /> Thank you for your thorough review and helpful comments. I will be sure to address these as soon as possible and send <br /> a revision your way. <br /> One question—on the soil gas probes(Figure 3,to be installed to 5'bgs),we would like the option to install these one <br /> day and sample the following day.These probes will be constructed much like a well with a filter pack and bentonite <br /> grout.They are completed with a ball valve which would be closed upon installation and only opened when sampling <br /> equipment has been attached.As such,there will be no open hole overnight,but I realize this may result in additional <br /> permit fees.I will be sure to update the work plan to reflect the schedule for decommissioning of each sample type,but <br /> please let me know if there are additional fees we should be paying upfront. <br /> We are aware of the requirement to submit results and will certainly be prompt to follow up on that. <br /> I hope to get the revisions back to you today or tomorrow.Given that revisions will come your way by the 26th,will the <br /> review time be sufficient to begin work on Feb 2?Please let me know what your schedule is and we will reschedule the <br /> drilling if necessary. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Jackie <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Monday,January 24, 20114:02 PM <br /> To:Jackie Lanzon <br /> Subject: RE: 800 West Church Street- boring permit <br /> Jackie, <br /> I've been reviewing your work plan and MFR in preparation for issuing the boring permit and I have <br /> some concerns. <br /> This site is considered a new site since the legal actions have taken place. As such, and in addition <br /> to the papers/fees you already submitted, you'll need to address the following before I can issue the <br /> permit: <br /> 1- a MFR is needed for the 'site', so we have a responsible party billing party identified for all NON <br /> drilling work and <br /> 2- a 'permit' MFR is also needed so we have a billing party for all work associated with issuing and <br /> conducting the inspections linked to the permit. any additional EHD charges the initial permit fees <br /> submitted do not cover are sent to the billing party identified on the 'permit' MFR. <br /> You submitted ONE MFR....is it a 'site' or 'permit' MFR? or do you want it to be both? It can be.. <br /> if GeoSyntec is accepting 'site' and 'permit' charges billed out by the EHD, then your one MFR <br /> submittal is fine? if not, I'll need another signed MFR before I can issue the permit. <br /> �i�ci�nt t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.