Laserfiche WebLink
07 April 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0235 <br />' Page 4 of 5 <br /> • A low concentration of benzene was detected in MW-7, located adjacent to MW-2, with a <br />' screened Interval at the current ground water surface, showing that shallow ground water is <br /> not significantly impacted <br />' Historical depth to ground water at the site has ranged from approximately 50 feet bsg in <br /> 1971 and 1975 to 30 feet bsg in 1985 and 1996, based upon ground water maps prepared by <br /> the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District between 1971 and <br />' 1996 Ground water is currently at its highest recorded depth of approximately 17 feet bsg <br /> • Ground water in MW-1, MW-2, MW-6B and MW-8B does not appear to be in direct <br /> t hydraulid communication with the ground water in MW-4, MW-5, MW-6A and MW-8A <br /> Monitoring well MW-3, screened from 30 to 55 feet bsg may be in hydraulic communication <br /> with all wells at the site <br />' Ground water elevations calculated using data from the wells with deeper screened intervals, <br /> indicated a possible ground water depression near MW-2 during the February 1999 <br /> 1 monitoring event Ground water elevations,based upon the wells screened above 40 feet bsg, <br /> indicate a southwest to southeast flow direction at the site The inferred ground water flow <br /> directions do not correspond with the prevailing historical flow directions observed at the <br /> 1 site Ground water may not have equilibrated in monitoring wells with water above the <br /> screened interval prior to collection of depth-to-water measurements,producing the abnormal <br /> gradient observed in the deeper monitoring wells at the site <br /> O Impacted deeper ground water appears to be limited laterally to the area near MW-2 and <br /> MW-1, although migration toward the southwest to southeast maybe possible Vertically, <br />' impacted ground water appears to remain limited to historic low ground water elevation of <br /> 40 to 50 feet bsg The impacted ground water plume does not appear to be migrating laterally <br /> of vertically <br />' 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the findings of the environmental activities recounted in this report, AGE recommends <br />' • Collection of grab water samples toward the south, southeast, east and northwest of the <br /> • g p <br /> former UST location Water samples should be collected at current and historical ground <br />' water depths to confirm the lateral extent of impacted ground water <br /> • Performance and presentation of a receptor well survey <br />' • Continued quarterly monitoring of the ground water monitoring wells onsite The next <br /> monitoring should be performed in May 1999 , <br /> F <br /> Advanced ntai Inc <br /> GeoEnwronene , <br />