Laserfiche WebLink
14 September 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0235 <br /> Page 8 of 8 ' <br /> s <br /> I5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the results of site investigation activities to date, AGE recommends <br /> • Continued ground water monitoring and sampling, <br /> • The vertical extent of the dissolved contamination should be fully defined,at the former UST <br /> No 3 area, prior to additional lateral assessment of the site, , <br /> • Preparation of an interim remediation work plan to address petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> ground water near the former UST cluster area <br /> v <br /> 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br />' environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were based upon <br /> analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluation of the geologic conditions at <br />' . the site for the purpose of this investigation was made from a limited number of available data points <br /> (e g CPT generated boring logs, grab ground water samples) and subsurface conditions may vary <br /> away from these data points No other warranty, expressed or implied,is made as to the professional <br />' opinions, interpretations and recommendations contained in this report <br />' 7.0. REFERENCES <br /> Maxey, GB , 1964, Hydrostratigraphic units Journal of Hydrology, v 2, pp 124-129 <br />' Robertson,,P K , Campanella,R G , Gillespie, D and Greig, J , 1986,Use of piezometer` cone data <br /> Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference in Situ 86, Use of In Situ Tests in <br /> Geotechnical Engineering, Blacksburg, p 1263-1280 ` <br />' Sanders, L L , 1998, A manual of field hydrogeology Prentice-Hall, Inc , New Jersey, 381 p <br /> Advanced GeoEnwranmental,Inc <br />