Laserfiche WebLink
� | <br /> / <br /> | <br /> | <br /> The ground water flow direction on 12/02/87 was directly ' <br /> towards the domestic well located about 140 feet northwestof the � <br /> | <br /> excavation. This probably resulted from pumpage from this well ; <br /> � the well is probably hydraulically connected to the water table | <br /> ^ � <br /> aquifer ( a well log is not available ) <br /> � ^ ! <br /> ` <br /> Th 454ZxV degree swing in the direction of ground water flow <br /> � between and is most likely attributable to either a <br /> � cessati -�/ot o�7pumpahe domestic- well , or the onset of heavy | <br /> oumpage from a nearby well to the east of the site. Since the ` <br /> magnitude of the gradient on 12/21 is twice that on 12/03, the / <br /> ` writer feels that most likely, the flow direction swing results | <br /> from heavy pumoage to the east of the site., <br /> This chance in the grouno water flow direction has <br /> apparently caused a regulatory problem at this site. The problem | <br /> stems from the requirement that a monitorzng well must be � <br /> ins�alle� and sampled down gradient from the source of <br /> contamination. Since the gradient has swung around , it is hard | <br /> / <br /> to tell just where down gradient is. Thus, plannLnq for a well . <br /> location is complicated . 1 <br /> / <br /> Recently, W. H. Fox II of WHF Environmental Consultants, <br /> remeasured the ground water level in these wells. The wells were � <br /> measured on 9/ 16 , 9/30 and 10/07/88. The writer constructed a ! <br /> three point problem to determine direction and magnitude of the <br /> ground water gradient. This time, there was even yet another / <br /> | <br /> ' solution to the problem which follows: <br /> | <br /> � <br /> 9/16 - 9/30 - 10/07 --- N 25 . 256 it / 100 +t . <br /> This rearesents an average of the three readings, the maximum � <br /> variation of which was 0. 07 ft. The readings for each of the ! <br /> three wells for each of the three days are shown in the apoerdix , <br /> along i'71. well readihgs for the measurements in December of <br /> 19S/ .DISCUS S!ON <br /> ` . ! <br /> ^ <br /> / <br /> The possible contamination at this site results from a ' <br /> � rupture of a 1500 gallon tank as it was being removed from the | <br /> | <br /> site. The writer nds, that appro tely120 to, 50gaIlons <br /> of moror o� � �� e '�ro����e~r��tured t ihtt�± o <br /> ca� oa <br /> 7 foot deep excavation. The spill was cleaned uo- by ~ excavation i <br /> of the soil in the bottom of the hole. ak_-about 15 � <br /> Minutes; the hole was deepened from 7 to <br /> 12 feet. During/, the ' <br /> deepening of the excavacion, ground water was encountered. / <br /> Approximately 4 cuoic yaros of material was excavated from the ! <br /> hble. Water from the bottom of the excavation was sampled . The <br /> lab results disclosew 39 ppm motor oil , 20 ppo benzene and 50 ppb <br /> xylene. The above was told to the writer by W. H. Fox if , who was | <br /> present at the time of the incident . <br /> l <br /> ( <br /> . � <br /> \ <br /> � <br />