Laserfiche WebLink
aCa <br /> • <br /> Appendlkx S <br /> DATA ANALYSIS <br /> Of the geophysical methods used at this site, only magnetic and GPR data require analysis. <br /> Descriptions of the data analysis procedures for these techniques are provided below. <br /> TF Computer Processing <br /> We up-loaded the TF data we obtained in the survey area to a portable computer and converted <br /> them into a format suitable for contouring. The contouring program calculated an evenly spaced <br /> array of values (data grid) based on the observed field data. The gridded values were then <br /> contoured to produce a TF contour map. <br /> TF Contour Map Interpretation <br /> Generally speaking, in a region with uniform conditions TF values vary smoothly from one area <br /> to another. In contrast, in areas where magnetic variations are strong,the contours are moderately <br /> to closely spaced. In many cases, the variations are so strong that the contours are highly <br /> contorted and convoluted, with differences of several hundred units. These contorted contours <br /> may appear as roughly concentric circles forming "bull's eyes", tightly wound loops and whorls, or <br /> elongated parallel lines. If the source of a particular anomaly is an isolated object or a group of <br /> . closely spaced objects, the contours may form isolated, somewhat symmetric closures known as <br /> "monopoles" (bull's eyes) or paired positive-negative closures known as "dipoles". If the source <br /> of a particular anomaly is group of several objects not very closely spaced, then the contours will <br /> often form highly irregular, non-symmetric closures. <br /> Areas that are typically considered anomalous are those which display large differences in data <br /> readings from one locality to the next. Particularly suspicious are areas where there are no <br /> obvious nearby above ground sources that could cause the variation. Actual anomaly magnitude <br /> and shape are dependent on the relative position and size of the buried objects with respect to <br /> the location of the measuring instrument. In general, anomaly magnitude decreases and anomaly <br /> width increases as distance (depth) to the source increases. TF monopoles that are centered on <br /> a single data point and limited in extent to roughly the data point spacing of the sampling grid are <br /> often caused by small, near surface objects. Such objects may consist of well caps, pull boxes, <br /> balls of wire, etc. Larger monopoles that extend across an area equal to several data points are <br /> typically associated with larger objects. Isolated dipoles are often, but not always, attributed to a <br /> single object such as a UST, vault, buried ordnance, etc. A large accumulation of buried objects <br /> may appear as a group of closely spaced, contorted anomalies or a single large, less contorted <br /> anomaly. Elongated anomalies with parallel contour lines or a linear alignment of circular or <br /> elliptical closures is often indicative of a buried pipeline or other elongate object. Those anomalies <br /> that are neither monopoles or dipoles often are associated with multiple objects buried near each <br /> other, such as those comprising a debris field. <br /> • B-1 <br />