Laserfiche WebLink
Cambria Environmental Technology, Inc. <br /> September 25, 2001 <br /> Page 2 <br /> interference. These two areas were the hedge area south of the bank building and the aisles <br /> under the canopy area. <br /> Task 2 We established a survey grid to guide the TF magnetic data acquisition. The grid <br /> consisted of north-south lines spaced 10 feet apart with paint marks at 5-foot intervals. <br /> Task 3 Following the grid set-up, we used a proton precession magnetometer to collect TF <br /> magnetic data at each of the paint marks. We then up-loaded the data to a field computer and <br /> processed them to produce a preliminary total field magnetic intensity contour map. This contour <br /> map was evaluated for localized magnetic variations (anomalies) that may be due to possible <br /> UST's or other similar buried ferrous objects. <br /> Task 4 The MD method was used to perform site-specific investigations of suspect areas identified <br /> on the TF contour map. This involved multi-directional traverses, approximately ten feet long <br /> spaced approximately 1-foot apart, centered on suspect areas. <br /> Task 5 We then used the MD method to conduct a reconnaissance of selected broader portions <br /> of the site. <br /> i <br /> Task 6 We obtained GPR profiles in suspect areas. These profiles were then evaluated for <br /> evidence of UST-like objects. <br /> Task 7 The last task undertaken in the field was to map the locations of above ground cultural <br /> objects and suspected buried features. <br /> RESULTS <br /> The results of the geophysical investigation are presented on Plates 1 and 2. Plate 1 is a <br /> generalized site map showing the locations of above ground features; the limits of the <br /> investigation area; the locations of suspected buried objects; and the locations of the GPR <br /> traverses. Plate 2 is a TF contour map depicting the distribution of TF values, the location of <br /> pertinent above ground objects which are believed to affect the TF values, and interpreted buried <br /> features. Based on our interpretation of the data presented on Plate 2 and the results of the metal <br /> detector survey, our conclusions for this site can be summarized as follows: <br /> The tightly spaced and convoluted TF contours evident on Plate 2 indicate the <br /> presence of notable amounts of ferrous metal. This is especially true in the canopy <br /> portion of the investigation area. <br /> While some of these anomalies can be attributed to the effects of known metallic <br /> objects, the majority of the anomalies are believed to be caused by buried metallic <br /> . debris. None of the TF anomalies are typical of those caused by UST's. <br /> r� <br />