My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006570
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTRY CLUB
>
1403
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505513
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2019 9:37:44 AM
Creation date
6/21/2019 9:01:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006570
RECORD_ID
PR0505513
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006438
FACILITY_NAME
United # 5446
STREET_NUMBER
1403
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12323246
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1403 W COUNTRY CLUB BLVD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION <br /> 3.0 Results <br /> 3.9 Test Data <br /> Table I contains the soil gas flow rate and well vacuum data obtained from the test. Table 2 <br /> contains the hydrocarbon concentration data obtained from the PID and from the laboratory <br /> tanalyses. Laboratory reports are contained in Appendix B. <br /> Figure 2 depicts the assumed area of impacted soils and the observed zone of influence <br /> calculated based on the SVE test. Figure 3 shows the measured stabilized vacuum data as a <br /> function of radial distance from the center of the backfill area. The radius of influence for <br /> each flow rate is determined from a best-fit line through the test data. <br /> Figure 4 is a plot of the measured extraction well head vacuum versus the measured soil gas <br /> flow rate. Figure 5 represents the relationship between radius of influence and soil gas flow <br /> rate. <br /> 3.2 interpretation of Data <br /> Test results were examined to p--ovide an esthna?e of the zone of influence of the horizontal <br /> pipe and an idea of the concentration of hydrocarbons that can be extracted. The effective <br /> radius of influence was estimated based on the nest-fit line through a plot of vacuum vs. <br /> distance data. While the radius of influence is defined as the radius at which no vacuum is <br /> finduced, a practical design approach is to use the radius at which the vacuum induced is 0.05 <br /> inches of water as the effective radius of influence. This conservative assumption is <br />' necessary due to the inherent error in field measurements of very small vacuums and the need <br /> for movement of soil gases at the periphery. Figure 3 is the plot of the vacuum vs. distance <br /> data. Error bars of+/- 0.01 inches of water were used for the best-fit since the precision of <br /> the field vacuum measurements are limited to this amount. The error bars for data points <br /> above 0.05 inches of water are relatively small because the vertical axis is a log scale and are <br /> therefore not shown. <br /> While the standard data analysis does not apply strictly, due to the fact that the configuration <br /> of the "well" is not typical, the data indicate that significant contaminant removal is feasible <br /> at the flow rates observed during the pilot test - the influence of the system was observed in <br /> all wells found within the known contaminated zone, so extrapolations to higher flow rates <br /> are not necessary. <br /> MZ/03_1a9WSTM7M M 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.