FIELD DOCUMENTS FILE 2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chevron #9-4054 May 2014 2103 Country Club Boulevard, Stockton Claim No: 12729 ATTACHMENT 1: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE WATER BOARD POLICIES AND STATE LAW The case complies with the State Water Resources Control Board policies and state law. Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code requires that sites be cleaned up to protect human health, safety, and the environment. Based on available information, any residual petroleum constituents at the Site do not pose significant risk to human health, safety, or the environment. The case complies with the requirements of the Low-Threat Underground Storage Tank (UST) Case Closure Policy as described below.' Is corrective action consistent with Chapter 6.7 of the Health and Safety ® Yes ❑ No Code and implementing regulations? The corrective action provisions contained in Chapter 6.7 of the Health and Safety Code and the implementing regulations govern the entire corrective action process at leaking UST sites. If it is determined, at any stage in the corrective action process, that UST site closure is appropriate, further compliance with corrective action requirements is not necessary. Corrective action at this site has been consistent with Chapter 6.7 of the Health and Safety Code and implementing regulations and, since this case meets applicable case-closure requirements, further corrective action is not necessary, unless the activity is Lnecessary for case closure. Have waste discharge requirements or any other orders issued pursuant to ❑ Yes ® No Division 7 of the Water Code been issued at this case? If so, was the corrective action performed consistent with any order? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA General Criteria General criteria that must be satisfied by all candidate sites: Is the unauthorized release located within the service area of a public water ® Yes ❑ No system? Does the unauthorized release consist only of petroleum? ® Yes ❑ No Has the unauthorized ("primary") release from the UST system been ® Yes ❑ No stopped? Has free product been removed to the maximum extent practicable? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Has a conceptual site model that assesses the nature, extent, and mobility ® Yes ❑ No of the release been developed? Refer to the Low-Threat Underground Storage Tank Case Closure Policy for closure criteria for low-threat petroleum UST sites. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board decisions/adopted orders/resolutions/2012/rs2012 0016atta odf Page 3 of 15