Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 5 <br /> I <br /> Mike Infurna [EH ] <br /> From : Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Friday, March 26 , 2010 9 : 37 AM <br /> To : 'Myers, Tonya' <br /> Cc : 'Evans, David ' <br /> Subject: RE: WP or Chevron 94054 <br /> #2 It Is . <br /> no revision or addendum needed . I 'll add conditions to my approval letter that will <br /> call out ONLY neat cement grout for the cc and the PVC casings and augers to be <br /> left in place during the 'flush -treaded ' cc is installed to ensure a minimum 2" neat <br /> cement grout annulus . <br /> start working on your SJ County Public Works encroachment permit requirements <br /> please . Lets see if we can get these wells before Christmas . <br /> btw, you included bioparameter data collection in this workplan over the next two <br /> semi-annual periods and then submit the IRAP and you plan to include these two <br /> wells in this ? Were you looking for EHD 'approval ' to do this ? I am required to <br /> address all inclusions in a work plan as 'adequate and necessary' and typically , <br /> things included and approved in a work plan must be included in the report of <br /> findings when the work plan field work is completed . Ideally, if the work plan is <br /> approved , then ALL things approved are to be in the report. With two SA events <br /> proposed in the work plan , that puts completion of this inclusion into 2011 or later, <br /> depending if these wells are included and get installed in 2010? Am I going to <br /> have to wait a full year + to see the report of these two well installs? not ideal . <br /> if you want approval for the bioparameter, it can be requested in the Semi Annual <br /> Monitoring Reports (SAMR ) recommendation section . I 'd rather not see these long <br /> range remediation requests included in an investigation work plan if you can help <br /> it. I don 't have a real comfortable feeling about how this is adequate or necessary or <br /> how it is done . You ' ll need to send me details and a technical justification for it . I <br /> will NOT include it as approved in my work plan comment letter but defer a review <br /> until after I receive your justification and details about it. <br /> From : Myers, Tonya [mailto :Tonya. Myers@arcadis-us.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8 : 55 AM <br /> To : Mike Infurna [EH ] <br /> Subject: RE : WP or Chevron 94054 <br /> Let's go with number 2 and I will make sure that the field crew has the e-mail chains between you and I <br /> 3/29/2010 <br />