Laserfiche WebLink
Pagel of 3 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH ] <br /> From : Evans , David [David . Evans@arcadis-us , com] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 07 , 2008 2 :03 PM <br /> To : Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: Myers , Tonya <br /> Subject: RE : former Chevron (4054 <br /> Sounds good . <br /> I will have Tonya add them to the analyte list for new wells that are going in if they are not already one there . <br /> Thanks again , <br /> David Evans <br /> From : Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto : MInfurna@sjcehd .com] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2 : 02 PM <br /> To: Evans, David <br /> Subject: RE : former Chevron (-4054 <br /> thanks for the response and inclusion . . . Whether your choice or Stephanie's , I <br /> appreciate the cooperation . <br /> let's get this QTR data and see what happens . . . . If TAME and DCA aren 't present , I <br /> see no reason for Chevron to include them quarterly for all wells . . . . . Maybe once in a <br /> while sample the existing wells , wells that show hits , and sample ALL new <br /> wells/borings for it . . . . <br /> TAME is showing up in the 40 '-50 ' interval in Blvd 's monitoring wells north of the site <br /> on Elmwood and on Franklin . <br /> With Stephanie asking about/pursuing "Co-mingle" concerns , I ' m curious why a <br /> typically Chevron additive is showing up on Elmwood , WEST of Franklin ? ??? ? <br /> by the way . . . any chance the pending MW-9 and MW- 12 , AND MW-4D well <br /> installations can get these COCs sampled for in selected soil samples? could go a <br /> long way in supporting source conclusions later on . . . <br /> thanks again for the cooperation . <br /> From : Evans, David [ma ilto : David , Evans@arcadis-us .com] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 1 : 51 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: Sfurgal@chevron .com; Myers, Tonya <br /> Subject: RE : former Chevron ( -4054 <br /> Hello Mike , <br /> The addition of 1 , 2- DCA and TAME during the 0 quarter should not be a problem . Will these analytes be <br /> 11 /7/2008 <br />