Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Infurna [EH) <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 8:06 AM <br /> To: 'tcuellar@advgeoenv.com' <br /> Subject: RE: Boulevard Automotive <br /> thank you. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Timothy Cuellar [mailto:tcuellar@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:13 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Boulevard Automotive <br /> Mike, I will forward you her comments by fax; she did comment that due to <br /> the lack of detection, I should contact you to further discuss. I just <br /> wanted to bring her comments to your attention. <br /> There was a 4th quarter 2004 QM done at Blvd. Auto; not sure why you don't <br /> have copy but I have talked with Christy and you will have copy shortly. <br /> There was 'NO' qm done during the 1st QR 2005 due to Parker's delinquent <br /> account; however, we did perform the 2nd QM 2005 on 13/14 April 2005. You <br /> will have a report of findings by the end of this month. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [SMTP:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 3:44 PM <br /> To: tcuellar@advgeoenv.com <br /> Subject: RE: Boulevard Automotive <br /> that's third quarter, right? Give me times and it should be ok. <br /> have you done/completed second quarter? Missing first QMR-2005 was your <br /> 'get out of jail card' use. . .If you haven't done 2nd-2005, you've got a few <br /> days left. Call me with the apt ASAP if it hasn't been done yet. <br /> as for MW-8, you/she may want to check with CCR 2652d. .I don't make the <br /> reqs, just enforce them. It say quarterly. Nothing in there about NOT <br /> sampling if non-detect or costing the fund money. If YOU (representing the <br /> RP) want to reduce sampling frequency for a/some monitoring well (s) , ask, <br /> and be prepared to justify. For the record, last I heard, $$$$$ isn't the <br /> justification for adequate subsurface monitoring, but lack of detections in <br /> a well is. Reduction to bi-annual or annual and/or reduction of chemical <br /> constituent from the event is/are all possible. EHD reviews and evals, and <br /> even directs to do more, but typically NOT to do less. I'm not against it <br /> mind you, just suprised that the CUF is now 'evaluating' effective <br /> quarterly monitoring. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Timothy Cuellar [mailto:tcuellar@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 2:10 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: Boulevard Automotive <br /> Mike, just got a call from Bob Heran of Gettlar-Ryan and he'd like to <br /> coordinate joint QM event for 15 August 2005. <br /> On another note, we recently received comment from Wennilyn Fua (USTCF) and <br /> she questioned whether continued sampling of well MW-8 was necessary and <br /> that future sampling of MW-8 may not be reimbursed. Do you have any <br /> 1 <br />