Laserfiche WebLink
' Third Quarter 2015(Semi-Annual)Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Former Pilkington North America,Inc. <br /> Lathrop,California <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br /> ' Summary of Diesel Skimming Operations(April 1 2015 through September 30,2015) <br /> ' Nineteen diesel recovery and skimmer operations and maintenance (O/M) events were conducted at the <br /> Site during the current six-month reporting period. Free product was observed in recovery wells RW-1, <br /> RW-2, RW-3, and RW-4, and approximately 13.28 gallons of product were recovered during the <br /> ' monitoring and skimming period (Figures 3A-3F, Attachment A). Product recovery from the Site's <br /> recovery wells has produced a cumulative total of approximately 263.46 gallons of recovered diesel <br /> (Figure 4,Attachment A). <br /> ' THIRD QUARTER 2015 GROUNDWATER MONITORING EVENT <br /> Field Observations <br /> On August 21, 2015, a Condor representative measured the depth to groundwater and recorded field <br /> observations at the three monitoring wells, and collected groundwater samples from the three monitoring <br /> wells and two facility sumps. Field observations included the physical appearance of samples (color, <br /> clarity, and presence of petroleum product sheen or phase in samples)and collection of water quality field <br /> parameters. Field parameters included dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation reduction potential (ORP), pH, <br /> electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), and temperature (see Attachment D for field <br /> ' forms). <br /> Groundwater field inspection samples collected from the monitoring wells were noted as cloudy without <br /> odor or sheen. The monitoring wells were purged until at least three well-casing volumes of water were <br /> ' removed and sampled with single-use disposable bailers. All wells were purged until the EC, pH, and <br /> temperature stabilized. <br /> ' Groundwater elevation measurements indicate that the average groundwater elevation in the three Site <br /> monitoring wells on August 21, 2015, was 0.43 feet, a decrease of 1.40 feet since previously measured on <br /> February 9, 2015. An estimated groundwater gradient of 0.0033 ft/ft to the east-northeast was calculated <br /> ' using water level data from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 (Figure 2). The groundwater <br /> levels measured on August 21, 2015, are included in Table 1, below. Groundwater measurements are <br /> provided in the field forms(Attachment D). <br /> Table 1. Groundwater Elevation Data(August 21,2015) <br /> Monitoring Well I Screened Interval(bgs) TOC Elevation Depth to Water Groundwater Elevation <br /> ' MW-1 7— 17 15.12 14.39 0.73 <br /> MW_2 6- 16 15.24 15.21 0.03 <br /> MW-3 6- 16 14.81 1 14.29 0.52 <br /> 'Top of Casing(TOC)Elevation:Elevations surveyed on 05/09/05 relative to NA1)83 and NGVD29 datum. <br /> ' bgs:below ground surface <br /> All measurements are in feet. <br /> ' Laboratory Analytical Results <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the three monitoring wells and two facility sumps were analyzed <br /> for TPH-D, TPH-K, and TPH-MO by EPA Method 8015M. Laboratory analytical results indicate that <br /> ' TPH-MO, TPH-K, and TPH-D were not detected in the samples collected from MW-2, MW-3, and the <br /> SW-sump on August 21, 2015. TPH-D and TPH-MO were detected in MW-1 at concentrations of 0.505 <br /> and 0.502 milligrams per liter (mg/L), respectively. TPH-D was detected in the SE-sump sample at a <br /> concentration of 1.34 mg/L. The samples were analyzed by Excelchem Environmental Labs of Rocklin, <br /> California. Laboratory analytical results from the August 2015 sampling event are summarized in Table 2, <br /> on the following page, and are also provided in Attachment E. Historic groundwater monitoring data is <br /> ' provided in Table A,Attachment C. %4, <br /> ' n CONDOR <br /> is <br />