Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> After the CPT borings were advanced, Geoprobe soil borings CPT 1 a and CPT2a were advanced <br /> immediately adjacent to each CPT boring Soil boring CPTla was advanced to approximately <br />' 109 feet bgs and CPT2a was advanced to approximately 114 feet Groundwater samples were <br /> taken from both boreholes using a Hydropunch groundwater sample was collected from each <br /> boring into the appropriate sample containers, labeled and stored in a cooler with ice The CPT <br /> borings and the Geoprobe borings were then grouted to the surface with cement slurry <br /> 2_2 Soil Matrix Sample Analysis <br />' Selected soil samples collected from the hollow stem auger bonngs were kept for laboratory <br /> analysis Sample tubes were capped at each end using Teflon tape and plastic end caps, and <br />' labeled, and stored in a cooler with ice Selected soil samples from the borings were delivered <br /> under chain-of-custody protocol to State-certified Excelchem located in Roseville, CA (FLAP <br /> Cert No 2119) for chemical analysis <br />' Soil matrix samples from borings MW4 through MW8 collected at depths of approximately 40 <br /> feet bgs and 50 feet bgs were analyzed for hexvalent chromium by EPA Method 7196 and <br /> subsequently by EPA Method 7199 Additionally soil samples were analyzed for total organic <br /> carbon by EPA Method 9060, total alkalinity by EPA Method 232013, and pH by EPA Method <br /> 9045C These analytes were selected to provide additional information in anticipation of <br /> potential future remediation <br /> Copies of the analytical reports and chain of custody documentation are included in Appendix D <br /> 2_3 Well Development <br /> L Groundwater monitoring wells MW4 through MW8 were developed on September 25 and 26, <br /> 2002 and October 1, 2002 The wells were purged using surge and bail techniques until the <br /> extracted water was relatively sediment free Development logs are included in Appendix C <br /> Purgewater was temporarily stored on site in 55-gallon drums <br />' All on-site wells were surveyed on October 22, 2002 by ATC and tied into the elevations of the <br /> existing wells Survey data is included in Table 2 <br /> 224 Fourth Ouarter Groundwater Sampling and Analysis <br /> Fluid levels were taken on October 1, 2002, utilizing an electronic water probe capable of <br />' measuring with an accuracy of I/100 of a foot Monitoring data is presented in Table 2 <br /> Fourth quarter groundwater sampling was conducted on September 25 and 26 and October 1, <br />' 2002 One groundwater sample each was collected from wells MW1 through MW8 and the <br /> facility well The samples were collected after purging a minimum of three well volumes and <br /> stabilization of electric conductivity, pH, and temperature Field purge logs are presented in <br />' Appendix C Subsequent to purging, groundwater was sampled and transferred to appropriate <br /> sample containers, using a clean, disposable bailer with a bottom emptying device to reduce <br />' w lwordpro1625831reports\Welt_install_rpt doc 4 <br />