Laserfiche WebLink
- - - <br /> Jerry Lile <br /> December 10, 2003 <br /> Page 2 <br /> northwest. Petroleum sheen has been reported in grab groundwater samples. <br /> DOCUMENTS REVIEWED <br /> We reviewed the August 2002, `Health Risk Screening Evaluation, Sudand Homes <br /> Property, Tracy, Califomia"and the August 1998 `Soil and Groundwater Investigation and <br /> Site Status Report, Surland Homes Property, Tracy, Califomia" prepared for Chevron by <br /> Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. in Oakland, CA and San Francisco, CA, respectively. <br /> SCOPE OF REVIEW <br /> The-document was reviewed for technical accuracy and validity of the human health <br /> screening-level risk evaluation for releases from the OVP onto the Surland Homes <br /> property. Site characterization data was reviewed to a limited extent, to determine <br /> adequacy with respect to use in a screening-level human health risk appraisal. <br /> Sampling details, analytical methodology, and technical approach were evaluated. The <br /> screening-level human health risk appraisal was evaluated for consistency with DTSC <br /> guidance and technical accuracy and validity. Neither the screening-level risk <br /> assessment, nor HERD's review, is reflective of the potential risks from any other <br /> potential or actual sources of release on the Suriand Homes property. Furthermore, <br /> releases from the OVP that have migrated off the Surland Homes property, particularly <br /> via groundwater, were not included in the scope of the risk appraisal or HERD's review <br /> of the document. <br /> GENERAL COMMENTS <br /> 1. HERD disagrees with the conclusion that no further action is required. There are not <br /> sufficient data to support a risk-based no further action declaration. Soil and <br /> groundwater data demonstrate impacts by petroleum contamination; however the data <br /> are not sufficient to draw conclusions regarding potential human health risks. <br /> 2. The screening-level human health risk appraisal was generally conducted as per <br /> DTSC guidance. The conceptual site model, exposure pathways, exposure <br /> parameters, potentially exposed populations, exposure scenarios, toxicity criteria, <br /> calculations of exposure point concentrations and intakes, and risk characterization <br /> were all evaluated and determined to be in accordance with DTSC's recommendations, <br /> except as noted below. <br /> SPECIFIC COMMENTS - Site Characterization: <br /> 1. The location of the pipelines, or former pipelines, need to be depicted in the maps. <br /> Include in the text the information regarding the depths of the OVP and APL, whether <br /> each is in place or removed, and if removed please specify the source of backfill used. <br />