Laserfiche WebLink
G�t�gicatTuluticslxc. - <br /> Additional Site Characterization Page 11 <br /> And 151 Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Project No.425.2 <br /> March 22,2004 <br /> during late spring and summer. Upward vertical gradients dominate over downward i <br /> gradients by a 4:1 ratio. <br /> ❑ Vertical groundwater gradients between the intermediate and deep wells have <br /> historically been found to be flowing upward. <br /> ❑ The dominance of upward vertical flow of groundwater may be the primary reason ! <br /> the contaminants has not impacted the drinking water aquifer. <br /> 3. Contaminant Plume 3 <br /> ❑ The shallow water table groundwater plume is laterally defined except to the west. <br /> Increases in TPH-G concentration in the western monitoring wells indicate that the <br /> plume may be spreading laterally toward the west. ; <br /> ❑ Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the groundwater at the site fluctuate with <br /> each monitoring event. The residual contamination in soil, up gradient of MW-2, <br /> remains a significant source of impact to the groundwater plume. <br /> ❑ The deeper groundwater plume may be undefined vertically since MW-106 and <br /> MW-201 were found to contain BTEX and TPH-G constituents. <br /> ❑I The three domestic wells sampled for the event remain non-detect, indicating that <br /> the drinking water aquifer has not been impacted_ <br /> - i <br /> Recommendations <br /> The following recommendations are made: <br />' 1. Prepare and submit a feasibility study reviewing the best remediation alternatives <br /> available and corrective action plan selecting the best remediation alternative. <br /> 2. Test for fuel oxygenates by EPA method 8260 annually during the second quarter of <br /> each year. <br /> 3. Continue quarterly groundwater-monitoring events. <br /> 5.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> This report was prepared in accordance with the generally accepted standard of care and <br /> practice in effect at the time Services were rendered. It should be recognized that definition <br /> and evaluation of environmental conditions is an inexact science and that the state or <br /> practice of environmental geology/hydrology is changing and evolving and that standards <br /> existing at the present time may change as knowledge increases and the state of the practice <br /> continues to improve. Further, that differing subsurface soil characteristics can be <br /> experienced within a small distance and therefore cannot be known in an absolute sense. 6 <br /> All conclusions and recommendations are based on the available data and information. f <br /> The tasks proposed and completed during this project were reviewed and approved by the <br /> local regulatory agency for compliance with the law. No warranty, expressed or implied, is <br /> made. <br />'F <br /> k <br />