My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
4491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544625
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 8:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 4:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544625
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003113
FACILITY_NAME
ZAPIEN MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
4491
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25504003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4491 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4491 Durham Ferry Road Page 4 <br /> The feasibility testing summary indicated that the radius of the soil contamination <br /> was 50 feet rather than the 70 feet which was used to calculate the mass of <br /> hydrocarbons. The only method evaluated for free product removal from MW1 <br /> was groundwater extraction, with another recovery well required. Passive <br /> skimmers have been very successful to remove the volumes of free product which <br /> have been typically observed, i.e. .03 feet. In this section of the report, SP1 rather <br /> than SP2, was reportedly used for sparging. This conflicts with other information <br /> in the report. <br /> Remedial Action Plan <br /> PHS/EHD concurs with the concept to use air sparging with vapor extraction. <br /> PHS/EHD recognizes the potential problems with regard to the possible migration of <br /> free product. However, PHS/EHD does not agree that a two recovery well <br /> extraction system is necessary to remove the relatively small volumes of free <br /> product which are observed in MW1 . As such, PHS/EHD will refrain from <br /> comment on the conceptual remedial design which was included in the report. An <br /> alternate conceptualized design plan should be submitted. <br /> Please submit by August 15, 1996 an addendum which addresses PHS/EHD <br /> comments. Quarterly sampling should continue and results included in the <br /> addendum. Please re-sample the domestic well, under PHS/EHD inspection and <br /> analyze the sample for BTEX, TPH-gas and MTBE. <br /> PHS/EHD attempted to schedule a meeting with you to discuss the report and to <br /> provide further regulatory directions so that the site can be remediated to <br /> acceptable regulatory limits and site closure issued. PHS/EHD still believes that <br /> such a meeting will be of benefit. Please contact me at (209) 468-0337 if you <br /> wish to discuss issues raised within this letter, to further clarify the revisions which <br /> are required or to schedule a meeting. <br /> Donna Heran, RENS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Mary Meays, Senior REHS MargatVt Lagorio, REHS <br /> Site Mitigation Unit Lead Senior <br /> MM14491 DURH <br /> c: Elizabeth Thayer, CVRWQCB c: George Lockwood, SWRCB <br /> c: Brook Birkie, Neumiller and Beardslee c: Marcus Niebanck, Clearwater <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.