My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
4491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544625
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 8:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 4:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544625
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003113
FACILITY_NAME
ZAPIEN MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
4491
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25504003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4491 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLEARWATER JUI- 1 1 1995 <br /> G R o u P, I N C. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Page 4, paragraph 2 - "PHS/EHD questions the necessity to modify the proposed <br /> feasibility testing..." The basis for the recommended modifications to the approved <br /> pilot testing program have been presented in this letter, and in previously <br /> transmitted submittals. If the PHS/EHD does not concur with the basis for the <br /> recommendations or the need for test modification, the test will be completed as <br /> proposed in the approved project workplan. It should be noted that information <br /> provided during the documented pre-test field evaluations suggests that the <br /> completion of testing in the manner originally proposed may not provide adequate <br /> long-term remedial design data. <br /> Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> Information presented in this letter and previously submitted reports and <br /> transmittals indicates the following: <br /> • It remains apparent that the ultimate long term remedial approach may involve <br /> a combination of groundwater and soil vapor extraction, with wells designed for <br /> the simultaneous extraction of these media utilized as extraction points. <br /> • Low oxygen concentrations in vapor extraction wills will likely marginalize the <br /> data to be obtained from a short-duration vapor extraction test. Clearwater <br /> recommends that the duration of the test be extended, with a not to exceed time <br /> limit established at five days of test operation. <br /> • Based on submitted information, Clearwater recommends that the methods for <br /> approved pilot testing be slightly modified to include a combined test, as <br /> specified in recent Clearwater letters. In addition to the combined test, slug tests <br /> would be conducted utilizing selected monitoring wells. Slug tests involve the <br /> rapid removal of a known volume of water from a monitoring well, usually <br /> with a large bailer, and the measurement of water recharge over a short period of <br /> time. Due to the fact that the Ruiz water supply well is completed at about 185 <br /> feet with an undetermined screened interval (personal communication with <br /> Stella Ruiz), it appears as if a pumping test using this well (as discussed in earlier <br /> letters) would yield no useful information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.