My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
4491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544625
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 8:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 4:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544625
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003113
FACILITY_NAME
ZAPIEN MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
4491
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25504003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4491 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-�CLEARWATER <br /> G R O U P, I N C. <br /> were less than 1.5% in all wells within the contaminant plume (VW-1 through 3, <br /> MW-2), and 10.5 % in MW-7, which is located outside of the contaminated area. <br /> These results indicate that the combustion process will be hindered during initial <br /> stages of the planned SVE test, resulting in the application of a less than ideal <br /> vacuum to the tested wells. The vacuum is limited due to the need to bleed fresh <br /> air into the system during the test through a pre-combustion bleed valve. A <br /> diagram of the Ceecon IC engine is attached. The location of the subject air inlet <br /> valve is shown. <br /> Analysis <br /> As we discussed yesterday, the results of the pre-testing have yielded the following <br /> information: <br /> • The shallow subsurface does not yield groundwater readily under bailing <br /> conditions. It is anticipated that the well would exhibit the same characteristics <br /> during the pump test. <br /> • The recovery well was only marginally developed during installation. While it <br /> is recognized that the formation will only yield low flows, it is also recognized <br /> that the test well should be as well developed as possible, thereby allowing the <br /> collection of the best data set possible during the aquifer/vadose zone testing. <br /> • Even with the limited information currently available, it is fairly certain that <br /> groundwater extraction alone will not sufficiently remove the contaminants <br /> from the subsurface. Experience with similar sites, however, suggests that <br /> vacuum assisted groundwater extraction is a potentially feasible remedial <br /> approach, and as such should be evaluated during the pilot testing process. As <br /> we discussed yesterday, this approach involves the application of vacuum to a <br /> groundwater extraction well, which a) increases the rate of sediment dewatering, <br /> b) exposes the vadose zone in the vicinity of the pumping well to the well screen <br /> and facilitates air flow, and c) generally incre=ases the rate of site remediation. <br /> A figure showing a generalized cross section of a dual phase well is attached. <br /> • While vacuum extraction may be feasible, it alone will not facilitate total site <br /> cleanup. Air sparging (also due to be tested) may assist in the removal of <br /> hydrocarbons from the water-saturated zone and for that reason is incorporated <br /> into the pilot testing program. Based on information generated to date, <br /> however, it appears as if some form of dual-phase extraction and treatment will <br /> be necessary, and Clearwater recommends the inclusion of the associated testing <br /> in the pilot program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.