Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> IjA '&. $ k <br /> �N <br /> PHASE f FIl'�RMiFALA(3IC INYEST1�ATit7� <br /> 4491 Wast Dud=Ferry Roof.Troy,UV13m19 <br /> -t Dcits Project No.40.91-732 <br /> PASO 5 <br /> { I � <br /> TABLE <br /> Ground Water Elevation.Data <br /> 0 <br /> T <br /> Date Elevation of Depth to Ground Water <br /> Monitoring Well WASUred 12P of Casin Elewition <br /> MW-1 09/04191 98.44 9.46 88.98 <br /> { 10113.191 10.81 87.63 <br /> t 10/20191 11.15 87.29 <br /> t <br /> MW-2 09/04/91 99.04 10.21 88.83 <br /> 10/13191 11.22 87.82 <br /> 10120!91 11.65 87.39 <br /> P t MW-3 09/03191 97.43 8.67 88.76 <br /> 10/13191 10.10 87.33 <br /> 10/20/91 10.62 86.81 <br /> I 'Relatives to ml assumed elevation of 100 feet. <br /> 3.5 5011 Clt�try <br /> Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals from 5 feet to 20 feet below the ground st:..yface from <br /> t I monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3. Soil samples were screened in the field will;L PM,and a int of eight <br /> soil samples were collected at or above the water table. The field screening reMts of the soil satnplcs <br /> collected indicated that t3fe concentrations of volatile organics ranged from below the PID's limit of detection <br /> to 120 parts per million(ppm). Table 2 presents the resWts of the field screening. Two of the eight soil <br /> l samples were selected for chemical analyses, and the remaining six soil samples were archived at the <br /> laboratory in the event additional testing was warranted. <br /> z r"� <br /> 1 <br /> i <br /> t PHIOOt.t3P <br /> Wi>mY <br />