Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> CLEARWATER <br /> ( It () L I' ] N C <br /> £vvuanmentaf Services <br />' In addition to the four confirmation soil borings, all on-site monitoring wells were sampled for the first <br /> quarter 2000 monitoring event This round of sampling should provide useful data for the evaluation <br /> of the lateral and vertical extent of dissolved-phase groundwater contamination The vertical extent of <br /> any residual contamination was addressed by the sampling of the two sparge wells, these wells are <br /> screened at a deeper interval than the other wells, thus providing information regarding any deeper <br /> groundwater contamination <br /> Methods <br /> Confirmation Soil Borehole Drilling and Soil Sampling <br /> Prior to drilling, a permit for the soil borings was obtained from the SJCPHS/EHD All fieldwork was <br /> performed in accordance with Clearwater's Field Procedures (attached) Prior to initiation of drilling <br /> activities, Clearwater and drilling subcontractor personnel reviewed and signed the Site Safety Plan <br /> On March 10, 2000, Clearwater supervised Fast-Tek g u Engineering Support Services in drilling the four <br /> g PP g <br /> soil borings (CB1 through CB4) (Figure 2) Fast-Tek, a C-57 licensed contractor based in Point Richmond, <br /> California, used a truck mounted Geoprobeg 5400 direct push drill-rig equipped with 2-inch diameter <br /> drill-rod to advance the soil borings All borings were drilled to a total depth of 30 feet bgs <br /> lieEach boring was continuously cored with PTEG liners Portions of each soil sample were retained for <br /> visual lithologic description by a Clearwater geologist using the Unified Soil Classification System A <br /> total of 17 soil samples (four from CB1, CB3, and CB4, and five from CB2) were selected and retained for <br /> laboratory analysis These samples were covered with teflon lined plastic end caps, labeled, documented <br /> on a chain-of-custody form, and placed on ice in a cooler for transport to the project laboratory The <br /> samples selected for laboratory analysis came from several depth intervals, including one from the <br /> bottom of each boring, 30 feet bgs Boring logs and well construction diagrams are attached Soil <br /> cuttings and auger/sampler rinseate were stored on-site in labeled 55-gallons drums pending future <br /> removal and disposal <br /> Groundwater Gauging and Sampling <br /> On February 7, 2000, all on-site wells (MW-1 through MW-7, and SW-1 and SW-2) were monitored <br /> RW-1 could not be sampled due to its being partially filled sediments Additionally, a water sample was <br /> collected from the on-site domestic well (DW) An electronic water level indicator was used to gauge <br /> depth to water accurate to within ±0 01-feet All wells were checked for the presence of SPH prior to <br /> purging No measurable thicknesses of SPH were observed in any of the wells <br /> The wells were purged until sampling parameters (e g temperature, pH and conductivity) stabilized, <br /> which occurred by approximately three wetl casing volumes Groundwater monitoring and well <br /> purging information was recorded on Gauge Data/Purge Calculations and Purge Data sheets (attached) <br /> ZBI07C Conf Borings/GWMR 1(100 3 Mach 27 2000 <br />