Laserfiche WebLink
ro EO%1B" STI SP-001 <br /> POWERS e°"" "° '° <br /> Fe 70796]IN MIO VALLEY AGRICULTURE SERVICES MIO VALLEY AO <br /> FP%]0]B - <br /> ENGINEERING&INSPECTION,INC. mnWy.WM9lLLUm Unleaded Gasoline <br /> Fuel Tank <br /> Executive Summary <br /> Powers Engineering and Inspection, Inc.(PEI)was contracted by Mid Valley Agriculture Servicesto provide <br /> an STI SP001 Inspection for Tank Unleaded Gasoline Fuel at the Mid Valley Ag facility, on 8/132019.This <br /> tank inspection included the tank, tank appurtenances, tank foundation,and tank containment. In addition, <br /> PEI inspected all piping, piping connections and supports, and tank related electrical components from the <br /> first skin Valve to the first flanged connection outside the containment. <br /> This report is generated on data gathered from three locations:applicable codes, regulations,and laws;the <br /> observed field conditions existent during the STI-SP001 inspection; and material provided in written form <br /> by the facility, end-user, or client (e.g., as-builts, previous inspection reports, written transcriptions of <br /> conversations with the facility).This inspection report is based solely on empirically observable conditions, <br /> observed during the inspection process and correspondence with the facility or end-user. <br /> The Unleaded Gasoline fuel tank is an 8-ft. diameter x 25.83-ft. long, horizontal cylinder, single wall tank <br /> with a nominal capacity of 10,000 gallons.The current product stored in the tank is Unleaded Gasoline fuel. <br /> Inspection Methods Results <br /> Goal Employed <br /> 1.Hydraulic . VT of tank a.Visual assessmentand non-destructive testing performed did not identify <br /> and bottom, any key components that may affect the hydraulic integrity of the tank. It <br /> Structuralappurtenances, is the Inspector's opinion that the tank is suitable for continued service. <br /> Integrity shell, piping, b.Thetank is resting on top offs concrete secondary containment dike.The <br /> containment area concrete dike is in good condition with no major cracking or damage <br /> for signs of identified. The tank is elevated off the concrete with three steel saddle <br /> product leakage. supports attached to the base of the tank. All supports are in good <br /> condition with only minor rust present. <br /> ¢The underside of the tank was inspected visually for signs of staining or <br /> leaks with none being identified. <br /> d.Ultrasonic thickness(UT)readings were performed along the accessible <br /> tank surfaces. The shell is 1/4-in thick. No significant metal loss due to <br /> internal corrosion was identified. <br /> 2.Release . VT of Release a.The tank has an inherent Continous Release Detection Method(CRDM) <br /> Detection Prevention Barrier as an elevated singlewall AST and qualifies as having overfill protection <br /> RPB in the form of a manual measurement device and concrete spill <br /> . Review of containment area. Consider installing a spill control box around the fill <br /> Continuous nozzle to catch any product in the event ofovedill Sewell as an automatic <br /> Release Detection tank level gauge. <br /> Method CRDM b.The tank has a release prevention barrier(RPB) as an elevated single <br /> wall AST and in the form a concrete dike that would contain any leaks. <br /> The tank may be categorized as an STI SP001 Category 1. <br /> c.Minor staining was identified around the inlet piping which appears to <br /> have occurred from taking manual height readings. The appurtenances <br /> piping and valve manifolds are subject to seepage over time and their <br /> condition should be monitored with periodic inspections. <br /> d.The tank may be categorized as an STI SP001 Category 1 because any <br /> leak would be continuously contained/detected by the secondary <br /> containment. As such, the next STI SP001 External Inspection should <br /> occur within 20 years(or before 2039).An STI SP001 Internal Inspection <br /> is not required.A leak test is not required. Periodic external inspections <br /> should be conducted monthly and annually. <br /> 3.Containment . Measure a.The secondary containment was in good condition and no leaks or <br /> containment defects were identified. <br /> . Determine b.Minor cracks were identified in the concrete containment which could <br /> permeability of hinder the containments ability to contain product. Consider sealing the <br /> containment <br /> ST MMIMOVPLLEYRC CG MSMUMSYMOMEKE°G0.4 EM0VPLIEY Page G.tr POM .G <br /> RG IEW <br /> OAIBPEBI Rc <br />