Laserfiche WebLink
I IrnwaA Ilcicn'�.�latona-1 onuth f sssartec. f•)•",(nunclu atcr A1,�nitit�np <br /> 1 Lisli"sP) 21, I'Yl$ <br /> I'. <br /> coIIcctcd h\ C fm(Ior Irom tlac t'ST CXC;IVation cat depths nl' ct Io I_' fret helrn� the ground Surface. 1.aborator\ <br /> anal\scs mchc,atccl cic\atcd concentrations o1­111 l-G, 1 HIII, and 131 E:\ in the soil samples. <br />' On Auj3ust 22. 1QQ5. three fr\dre}punch horintps \\crc clrillccl at ilia site. (Pasolinc odors �-\'cre notcd in each <br /> horcholc. l.ahoraton anakscs indicated cL}raccntrations ol' P11-6 .and € TLIX ill the soil .and eroiinchN ater <br />' samples ;ural\icd frcml each borcholc. €3ased fill the rcmdls 01' the ALI'''UNt. 1()c��, ins esti atic,r�. Condor <br /> recc,lnlnc•nficd aflflitif}nal iMcsti2,Iti0tr he c0lIduck:d tL, r\alu.rtc• tIlC rXtcnt of'tht: hsdrocarhon Plurnc. On :1ugus1 <br />' -9. 1006, f i\c• (lcoprnhc horcho€es \ccre instal led at tliv site. 'I he ruSLIIIS of'the I,:horatnr\ a11ak SC, iltdicatcd that <br /> cic�ated ConCC]ItratlUnS of 1"I'l l-G. E3'1•}:\. and Al ere detected in soil and a'roUndwater .samples at the north <br />' portion of the site and that turthcr investigation \\as necessarN 10 cNaluatc the CXtent of suit and p.roundwatcr <br /> contamination. <br /> Based on the results of tilt Geoprobe investigation, Condor recommended that monitor wells he installed at the <br />' site to investilate and monitor the lateral extent ofthe oasokinc and dieticl contamination p1LInle. On September <br /> 10, 1 L)Q7, C'undor installed four numitoring \'.ells at thu site. lite Puporl - .4r1chtiomil .Soil Liml (1rowichrmc t- <br /> 1»a•rAtiVC11corl. datt'd 1)cc01lahcr 1 1. 1997. \\as prcp.arCd h} Condor to dc,cmhc the investigation resrlits. <br />' t_ahoratory anal sax Indic, that i. E3'fE.X L'(,nStIILleutS. \1113F. lertiary hutanol, and I ANIf: \+crc <br /> detected in some 01 the so'sl and ground\�ater samples collected during the imestigation. Grmindl%atcr cicNation <br />' data indicated that ground\\atcr floe at the site \\as probahl\ controlled h\ the ver\ active island drainal.*c <br /> pumping adjacent to the site. I fle above referenced report recommended qLI.IrterIV groundwater monitoring. <br />' surface tcater sampling. and Rist. Based C'orrecti\c Action (RBC•A) to further characterize the Site and to <br /> evaluate: options for remediation or site closure. A comprehensive Site background is included as Appendi\ 11. <br />' 3. FOURTH QUARTER, 1997, GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> On December 3I. 1997. Condor personnel were on site to measure \\ater levels and collect ground\vater samples <br /> from the site monitor Tells. All field equipment was decontaminated in the fic€d with a solution (if' laboratory- <br />' grade. non-phosphate detergent and hydrocarbon-free water and rinsed \\ith It\drocarhon-free water prior to use <br /> in each well. All field instrUnIents were calibrated to the manufacturer's recommended standards. The «iter <br /> level in each �%ell \%aS ntcnsured to the nearest 0.01 foot t�ith a standard batter\-operated, flat-tape. water-level <br /> meter. A ne\�. disposable, polveth,lenc bailer teas 1(mert:d into each N.cll to collect a field-inspection sarliple. <br /> The hailer sampIc was inspected for floating product, sheen, discoloration andior odor. €bating product was tort <br /> tJ CONDOR <br />