Laserfiche WebLink
i,1-..1, Ile I II,,.K I IF'I t I I"Ist t I,0"ar C I <br /> 0 1 it.IT <br /> Laboraton, Methods <br /> AVI,IIN lc(ti i B I I x I I'll-6 Nilratc <br /> JMC(hiKi oo2 50.301.1 1 1 o I 3m) 3(w SM-3iOU-1 C <br /> T <br /> 1010CIIC. V% <br />' I I']I-(I it it:i I pcirkilcimi IIN lirucarhutt,. q aunlificki ;1,.plwl lilt: <br /> I-,!]I I L: Al I i,1 I[I C Tj I C I IN I F}:n i.irN hula I ci hL!T I M f It I. L-t I Ixwl. tvrl I xN !,L I[MI II, J I-I Sk I PTUI`II C I h L7T.1 0111.%1 <br /> I C Il I J rN-h LI h I riper icr(I I BF)and lcril:IT-\ .Ilnk I lixth\I clht'T I AML <br /> 4.2 1,AII0RATOItN' ANAL)'TIC-ALIZESULTS <br /> Laboratory analyses of'groundN\atcr saillples collected from the site monitor \\clls indicated that BTEX. TPP-Ci <br /> and the selected uasolilic 0xVgc11ate%!additi%es %%ere not detected at or ibovc the laboratory reported detection <br /> limits In the sam p[e collected from M\V-I or the ri iisatc sain pie ( 1132-'•111'5-12'31/97). Ethanol. DI PE. and <br /> F.TBE \acre not detected at or ah0\L: the laborolorN reported dCtCCti011 limits in am oftlic gruund\%atcr samples. <br /> ]ATFX. [-P]1-C), and lertiarN butanol \%crc not detected at or aboN c the laborzilorN reported detection limits in the <br /> sample collected I"l-0111 M11'-3 N. 1-FTIF and T.A\lf: vcrc detected al 4L)() -,I,(] <br /> pvd. ruspeclkek. in M1V-3. <br /> -' <br /> IAM C0IICCWFa1'0I1S 01 B A C�)JJNJ tLICIIIS �1111_1 I P1 M' �%crl.: detected ill 111C S.ITIII)IUS CV11CCtL!d fl-0111 \111' <br /> and <br /> ' <br /> %I%I11'-4. N11 Bl' \\ 111 as detected -4 at 8.2 niu, [. NIT13F. lcrtiar% hUtanol. and 'I AME \\ere cictL:ctcd at -1—7.0()0. <br /> 1.400. and 130 �u_,1. respectivek. III The 1,11`10raton results ofthe gi-01.111(k%ater samples are presented in <br /> Table 2, on the next pagc. Historical gr0LInd%%atcr monitoring and analytical data are Included in Table 4. 111 <br /> Section 4.4. <br /> X <br /> 4M 44iw <br /> CONDOR <br />