Laserfiche WebLink
tabulated analytical data from this investigation can be found in the Condor-prepared Soil and <br /> Ground water Investigation and Sensitive Receptor Survey Report, dated 02 October 2000 <br /> In September 2000, a sensitive receptor survey was conducted for the site The drainage ditch and <br /> island drainage channel are the only potential receptors within a 1,000-foot radius of the site <br /> Ms Margaret Lagorio of San Joaquin County EHD referred the site to the CVRWQCB for oversight <br /> by letter to Mr Marty Hartzell of CVRWQCB, dated 05 January 2001 According to Ms Lagono <br /> the action was taken because of their determination that the source of the MTBE contamination was <br /> the AST system and not the former UST system In an internal memo dated 29 March 2001, the <br /> CVRWQCB concurred with the PHS-EHD decision and transferred the site to the CVRWQCB Site <br /> Cleanup Section for further oversight <br /> i <br /> On 02 April 2001, the CVRWQCB issued a letter stating that no further action is required for the <br /> former UST system at the site <br /> By letter dated 05 June 2001,Ms Wendy Cohen of CVRWQCB finalizedMonitoring and Reporting <br /> Program (MRP) No 5-01-0835 and approved Additional Ground Water Investigation Work Plan, <br /> dated 07 May 2001, prepared by Condor The MRP describes the ground water monitoring and <br /> reporting requirements for the site The work plan was prepared to further investigate the lateral and <br /> vertical extent of impacted ground water Ms Cohen also agreed with Condor's recommendation <br /> to abandon well MW-1, since it is no longer a necessary monitoring point for the MTBE plume <br /> associated with the AST system at the site <br /> On 07 through 09 October 2002, Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc (AGE) advanced seven soil <br /> borings at the site Pilot borings MW5 through MW 10 were completed as groundwater monitoring <br /> wells using two-inch diameter PVC casing with 0020-inch slotted screen installed from <br /> approximately 4 feet to 14 feet bsg in borings MW5, MW9, and MW 10 and from approximately 50 <br /> feet to 60 feet bsg in borings MW6,MW7 and MW9 with blank casing extended to the surface EW 1 <br /> was completed as a ground water extraction well using six-inch diameter PVC casing with 0 020- <br /> inch slotted screen installed from approximately 4 feet bsg to 19 feet bsg <br /> TPH-g was detected at a maximum concentration of 4,000 mg/kg(MW6-5) BTEX was detected at <br /> a maximum concentration of 34mg/kg,310 mg/kg, 110 mg/kg and 720 mg/kg,respectively(MW6- <br /> 5) The fuel oxygenates MTBE and TAME were detected at maximum concentrations of 56 mg/kg <br /> (EPA Method 8260B) and 2 2 mg/kg in sample MW6-5 TBA was detected at a concentration of <br /> 0 30 mg/kg in soil sample MW7-5 Additional information can be found in the AGE-prepared <br /> Monitoring and Extraction Well Installation Report dated 01 November 2002 <br /> A more detailed description of previous investigations at the site can be found in the <br /> Condor-prepared documents Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Report Second Quarter 2001, <br /> dated 31 July 2000,and Soil and Groundwater Investigation and Sensitive Receptor Survey Report, <br /> dated 02 October 2000 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />