Laserfiche WebLink
Suggested Corrective Action: Follow the SP001 standard or another industry standard or provide equivalence. Ensure <br /> that this is discussed in the SPCC plan. An alternative would be a hybrid plan which is discussed in the EPA guidance <br /> pages 7-46. <br /> For#715: CFR 112.8(c)(8)(v) states: <br /> (v)You must regularly test liquid level sensing devices to ensure proper operation. <br /> While it is true that during the inspection the clock gauge appeared to not be damaged, a visual inspection of the clock <br /> gauge is not adequate to determine proper operation. The regulation requires liquid level sensing devices to be tested <br /> per good engineering practices. The SP001 standard does have the question in the monthly checklist that addresses this <br /> regulation but that is not included in your facility's current inspection form: <br /> Is overfill prevention equipment in good working condition?If it is equipped with a mechanical test mechanism,actuate the mechanism to confirm <br /> operation. <br /> Suggested Corrective Action: Incorporate the above question into your current monthly inspection form (or make your <br /> form clear as to what is exactly being inspected/tested) or discuss how liquid level sensing devices will be tested to <br /> ensure proper operation in the SPCC plan. <br /> If you have any questions please let me know. <br /> Best Regards, <br /> Lydia Baker <br /> Registered Environmental Health Specialist <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 209-468-8257 <br /> Ibaker@sigov.org <br /> Please note my email address has changed to Ibaker@sjgov.org <br /> From: Burgin, Andy C (Fresno) USA<andy.burgin@lehighhanson.com> <br /> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 10:13 AM <br /> To: Baker, Lydia <Ibaker@sjgov.org> <br /> Subject: RE: Full Inspection Reports <br /> Good Morning Lydia, <br /> I think we might be off path here on deviation. Not using SP001 are not a deviation from 40 CFR 118.2 requirements, my <br /> position is that any PE developed inspection schedule fits those regulations. For my clarity, your office's opinion that <br /> SP001 is an industry standard and therefore not to be deviated from, is that correct? Can you provide code or <br /> documented study to back up the industry standard or is it just the county's general opinion? If SP001 is the only <br /> inspection form,then why has no local, state, or federal agency passed code to require it's use? I've prepared plans for <br /> over 12 years, the industry standard for engineers is a lot more flexible than you might think on this issue.As it is a <br /> national program your office would have to prove the industry standard is set nationwide. Engineers use portions of test <br /> methods all the time, as the full test method does not fit site specific needs. <br /> 3 <br />