Laserfiche WebLink
TAB* 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED SA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Herman & Helen's Marina, 15135 Eight Mile Road, Stockton, San Joaquin County <br /> Ell 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, No water supply wells were identified within 1,000 feet of <br /> agriculture, industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site; the site. The nearest surface water body is the Little <br /> Connection Slough, which is a source of drinking water. <br /> y 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former and existing tank <br /> systems, excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation Three USTs were removed in <br /> contours, gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities; 1981• Site maps are provided. <br /> Y� 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; Soil borings show silty sands, silty clay and peat <br /> soils 30 feet. <br /> a 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); Excavated soils were returned to the tank pit <br /> excavations, or disposed off site. <br /> 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate,, Four monitoring wells have been installed. The wells will be retained for <br /> Y investigation of the suspected AGT release. <br /> FY 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths to water; Depth to water is 4 to 6 feet bgs, and groundwater <br /> flow is consistently to the southeast. <br /> FT7. Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: The maximum groundwater concentrations in pg/I show TPHg at 3,100; <br /> BTEX at 70,43, 45, 680, respectively,MtBE at 190,000; TBA at 3,300; <br /> Detection limits for confirmation sampling and TAME at 1,370. No indication of lead analysis. TPHg and BTEX <br /> ❑ Lead analyses constituents were identified downgradient of the former USTs. Fuel <br /> oxygenates were identified downgradient of the AGTs. <br /> Y 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil <br /> and groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: Lateral and vertical extent of soil and <br /> Lateral andY❑ Vertical extent of soil contamination groundwater contamination is defined for <br /> Lateral and Vertical extent of groundwater contamination the former UST. Additional work may be <br /> y� y❑ needed to define the AGT release. <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and A remediation system was not operated at <br /> groundwater remediation system; this site. <br /> Q10.Reports/information 171 Unauthorized Release Form 0 QMRs <br /> y❑ Boring logs PAR F1 FRP y❑ Other(Soil and Groundwater Investigation Report) <br /> 11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an explanation for not using BAT; UST removal, natural attenuation of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> y� 12.Reasons why background waslis <br /> unattainable using BAT; TPHg and BTEX constituents remain in on-site soil and groundwater. <br /> 0 N 13.Mass balance calculation of substance <br /> treated versus that remaining; A mass balance was not completed. <br /> N 14.Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in risk 0 A risk assessment was not completed.assessments, and fate and transport modeling; <br /> Y 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Soil and groundwater contamination associated with the <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses. former UST is limited in extent. Site transferred to the <br /> Regional Water Board Site Cleanup Section for further <br /> remedial actions. <br /> gy: Comments: Three USTs(one 1,000, one 3,000, and one 10,000 gallon) were removed in October 1991. Soil <br /> contamination was identified in the tank pit soils, multiple borings were completed, and four monitoring wells have been <br /> installed. Groundwater monitoring has been conducted quarterly since September 1997, and TPHg, BTEX, and low MtBE <br /> (maximum 14 jig/1) was identified in MW-4 directly downgradient of the former US Ts. MtBE(maximum 190,000 pg/I), TBA, <br /> Date: and TAME have been identified in MW-2 and-3 directly downgradient of the existing AGTs. Based on these results, <br /> /��// Board staff determined that the UST site should be closed, and the case transferred to the Site Cleanup Section for <br /> / regulatory oversight of the AGTs. <br />