Laserfiche WebLink
sent By;: BASELINE; 510 420 1707; Nov-9-99 16:28; page 181129 <br /> U <br /> miles per hour (California Department of Water Resources 1998). Wind speeds are gen all <br /> y <br /> highest during the spring months and lightest in the fall and winter. <br /> The San Joaquin Valley Air Basin has surface-based inversions during the morning hours throughout <br /> the year. Elevated inversions are much less frequent than surface inversions. In terms of mean <br /> mixing depth (the layer of air available for vertical mixing of pollutants), winter has the worst <br /> inversion characteristics (California Air Resources Board, 1974 as cited in Paoli and Associates, <br /> 1991). In addition, Stockton receives 10 to 15 inches of precipitation annually (Oregon Climate <br /> Service, 1995). <br /> No human receptors are currently exposed to contaminants in air under current site conditions. <br /> Future human receptors frequenting the water square could potentially be exposed to contaminants <br />€ in air,if releases from surface soils via wind or volatilization from subsurface soils or groundwater <br /> occurred. Under the proposed redevelopment plans, the majority of the site would continue to be <br /> capped or covered with imported soil and landscaping materials. However, volatilization and/or <br /> wind dispersal of subsurface contaminants could take place on-site in areas not paved.The number <br /> of people exposed under the future conditions cannot be estimated.It is expected that exposure to <br /> any releases to air would be greatest for on-site occupants, and substantially less for off-site <br /> receptors, which are primarily commercial site users. No schools, day care centers, hospitals, <br /> nursing homes, retirement communities, coastal or freshwater wetlands, national parks, or other <br /> sensitive populations are within the area adjacent to or nearthe project site;these sensitive receptors <br /> would therefore not be affected by any on-site releases. (See the Ecological Screening Evaluation, <br /> below, for special status ecological species.) <br /> SUMMARY OF SAMPLING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS <br /> ON-SITE, <br />{ Phase II Investigation <br /> Sampling of subsurface soils, groundwater, sediments, and wood pilings was conducted by Black <br /> & Veatch and their subconsuitant for the project site, as described in the Phase 11 Environmental <br /> 4 Investigation Report, Weber Block(Area 9) (Black&Veatch, 1999a). Sampling activities did not <br /> include collection of samples near the former Shell Station/Bridgestone facility;sampling activities <br /> at this location are described below.All field sampling activities were conducted in accordance with <br /> a Sampling and Analysis Workplan for Weber Block (Black & Veatch, 1998b), and under the <br /> P S <br /> direction of a Health and Safety Plan(BASELINE, 1998). Both plans were reviewed and approved <br /> r by DTSC prior to the sampling. U.S.EPA also reviewed the Sampling and Analysis Workplan. All <br /> samples,described below, were collected on 16 and 20 April 1998. <br /> j Soil samples from nine soil borings,four grab groundwater samples(including one sample from an <br /> off-site,upgradient position near the former ARCO facility),three sediment samples,and four wood <br /> piling samples were collected as part of this investigation. Quality assurance/quality control samples <br /> were also cu1lected and analyzed as part of this investigation as de.5cnbcd in the Phase 11 <br /> investigation. No composite or background samples were collected as part of this investigation. <br /> Also, no air or surface water samples were collected. <br /> 97369sstk,pon.wpd-1 119/99 12 <br /> 1 <br />