My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012678
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
141
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544645
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012678
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2019 12:40:53 PM
Creation date
7/11/2019 10:11:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012678
RECORD_ID
PR0544645
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004979
FACILITY_NAME
CIVIC CENTER PARKING*
STREET_NUMBER
141
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13909002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
141 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> LEEDSH ILL,HERKEMHOFF.INC. <br /> for depths of 16.5 to 36.5 feet. SB3 contained high concentrations of TPH as <br /> gasoline ranging from 160 to 5,100 mg/kg at all depths except 21.5 feet. <br /> The highest concentration level of 5 100 mq/kq from burin1 S53 occurred at 31.5 <br /> feet, within 5 feet of where groun wa er was encountered during dril ing <br /> operations. The deepest sample analyzed within the excavation was from boring <br /> (S84 at 36.5 feet, which contained i mg/kg TPH as gasoline. This indicates that <br /> there was probably a significant release of gasoline in the vicinity of soil <br /> boring SB3 and S84 and that this petroleum hydrocarbon contamination migrated <br /> _ vertically down to at least 36.5 feet and probably impacted the groundwater <br /> beneath the excavation. Tl'e low concentrations of gasoline constituents found <br /> in SB2 indicate that the contamination is located primarily in the eastern half <br /> of the former UST excavation. Low or non-detectable concentrations of BTX&E and <br /> _ TPH found in MWI and S81 Udicate that the contamination has not migrates; to the <br /> south of the former excavation. However, the high concentrations of BTX&E and <br /> TPH found in MW2 indicates that the contamination from the excavation has <br /> migrated laterally to the north and possibly off-site at a depth of approximately <br /> r. <br /> 16.5 feet. <br /> The contaminated soil appears to be limited to those soils within an area <br /> approximately 30 feet wide beneath the center':to eastern end of the former UST <br /> - excavation to a depth of at least 36.5 feet beloq the surface. It appears as <br /> though little, if any, of the contamination as migrated to the sout;,, of the <br /> Y former excavation. However, with the high concentrations of sail contaminants <br /> found durirr, the boring for MW2, at a depth of 15 feet, lateral definition of the <br /> contamination to the north of the excavation cannot be made. <br /> Since the shallowest soil samples that .were analyzed from borings S03 and SB4 <br /> were retrieved from a depth of 11.5 feet within the contaminated area, and <br /> contained high concentration levels of TPH as gasoline, it is unknown whether the <br /> overburden soils from the surface to a depth less than 11.5 feet are <br /> ,... contaminated. Because of this, these overburden soils should be segregated <br /> during subsequent remediation activities <br /> and/or analyzed prior to remediation to <br /> determine proper handling and disposal. <br /> i S r j vn �t�oc✓O <br /> Soil Boring Adjacent to the Waste oil Tank <br /> Analysis of soil samples from SB6 adjacent to the waste oil tank indicate non- <br /> t' detectable concentrations of BTUE and TPH as gasoline and diesel at all depths <br /> { sampled. This indicates that even though the waste oil tank failed the precision <br /> tank test, it may not be leaking. It is possible that contamination from the <br /> waste oil tank could be present on the northeast side of the tank; however, the <br /> presence of the building precluded access for sa�!ing on this side of the waste <br /> oil tank. <br /> Lee, <br /> hr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.