Laserfiche WebLink
a � - <br /> 1 <br /> t <br /> EOSHILL•HERKEMHOiF.INC <br /> Fable 4 <br /> •t. <br /> r Weber Point <br /> �. Groundwater Levels <br /> Well plumber RPToWepth to Water Surface r' <br /> Elevation Water <br /> aterz� €lavation <br /> r-t (feet} (feet) (feet) s <br /> MW1 11.99 33.50 <br /> .., MW2 12.36 33.84 -21.83 <br /> 4 r,' <br /> �3 12.16 33.73 -21ST (. . . <br /> ii Based on a 1929 City of Stockton datum. f <br /> 21' As measured on October 11 1990. ; r> <br /> From the groundwater level measurements taken on October 1, 1990, groundwater <br /> F 9 <br /> beneath the site appears to be flowing in an easterly direction at a relatively . <br /> flat 'gradient of. approximately 9.28 percent. See Figure 6 for potentiometric <br /> groundwater contours. This data is consistent with annual groundwater contour <br /> maps produced by ,San Joaell <br /> quin County Flood Control and Water Conservation F i <br /> District. <br /> r, As discussed in Section 3.3 Geologic Cross-Section, because the poienticmetric <br /> groundwater levels beneath the site am: present at depths 20 feet deeper than the <br /> present water.level in the Stockton Channel, it appears that the aquifer beneath l <br /> the project site is not hydraulically connected to the Stockton Channel: The tt <br /> source of water recharging the aquifer beneath the project site has not been 1 <br /> 1 <br /> z investigated. <br /> 7 r <br /> r <br /> f i <br /> a 21 <br /> r <br /> , <br />