Laserfiche WebLink
r r 1 <br /> _ � J <br /> 07 December 1999 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br />' . ;Page2of4 <br /> Purge water stabilization field data sheets are included in Appendix A Purged water was stored on- <br /> site in labeled DOT-approved 55-gallon drums <br /> N r <br /> 2 2 ' GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br />' Water samples were collected from each purged well using new, clean, disposable plastic bailers <br /> Immediately upon retrieval, the samples were transferred'into EPA-approved 40-m1 VOA vials - <br /> containing 0 5 milliliter hydrochloric acid (18%) as a sample preservative The vials were then <br />' labeled and placed In a chilled container The samples were transported under chain-of-custody to <br /> McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI) a DHS-certified laboratory in Pacheco, California for analysis <br /> Ground water samples were analyzed in accordance with <br /> • EPA Method 8015 Modified for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH- <br /> g), ` <br /> • EPA Method 8020 for volatile aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and <br /> total xylenes BTEX), and <br />' EPA Method 8260 Modified for fuel oxygenating compounds including di-isopropyl ether <br /> (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether(ETBE), methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE), tertiary amyl <br />' methyl ether (TAME) and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water flow direction and gradient were calculated from the field data The current <br /> tdistribution of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons was inferred from laboratory analytical results of <br /> E <br /> the ground water samples <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND DIRECTION <br /> Depth to ground water at the site ranged from 25 75 feet to 26 80 feet below the tops of the well <br /> casings The relative ground water elevation at the site ranged from 71 35,feet to 73 08 feet The <br /> elevation and ground water depth data is depicted in Table 1 During the September 1999 monitoring <br /> event, ground water flow direction appeared to be somewhat easterly, but very low gradient causes ' <br /> distortions of the contour lines The relative elevation of the ground water surface at the site is <br />' illustrated on Figure 3 <br /> 1 Advanced GeoEnwronmental,Inc <br />