My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007813
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
632
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0505525
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2019 5:08:17 PM
Creation date
7/15/2019 4:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007813
RECORD_ID
PR0505525
PE
2953
FACILITY_ID
FA0002387
FACILITY_NAME
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
632
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14907033
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
632 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� 1 <br /> IAppendix A <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br /> 1 4 _ <br /> • The lateral extent of hydrocarbon-impacted ground water has been assessed down-gradient <br /> and cross-gradient of the former UST area(Figure 2) <br /> IFEASIBILITY TESTING OF ON-SITE GROUND WATER EXTRACTION <br /> In a document titled Corrective Action Plan - November 1995, dated 15 November 1995, AGE <br /> Irecommended Implementation of soil vapor extraction in conjunction with in-situ air sparging for , <br /> remediation of the petroleum hydrocarbon-Impacted soil and ground water at the site At the time <br /> the CAP was prepared, ground water extraction was generally not viewed as an effective and cost <br /> efficient method of ground water remediation,but this method has gained more favor recently as a <br /> method to address impacted ground water when other technologies (e g , air-sparging) may not be <br /> controllable or effective, due in part to reduced extracted water treatment and disposal costs <br /> Since the approval of the CAP in December 1995,the local and regional ground water elevation has f <br /> I risen significantly(20 feet) and has maintained a depth-to-water of approximately 25 feet bsg AGE <br /> believes that the sustained Increase of ground water elevation has significantly decreased the <br /> potential effectiveness of the proposed S VE/IAS method as a stand alone treatment for impacted soil <br /> and ground water, due to a reduction in thickness of the impacted vadose zone and an increase in <br /> thickness, and volume,of impacted soil(and ground water)in the saturated zone The impacted soil <br /> is primarily fine grained, which may make the upward and lateral,path of sparged air through the <br /> Isaturated zone unpredictable and stripped hydrocarbons unrecoverable <br /> The vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil had not been fully assessed when the CAP was <br /> developed The mass of adsorbed hydrocarbons now known to be within the saturated zone Is <br /> significant Recent evaluation of soil and ground waterbelow 50 feet bsg has documented significant <br /> concentrations of dissolved and adsorbed hydrocarbons that must be satisfactory mitigated to achieve <br /> site closure <br /> At the present time,dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations are known to extend to 80 feet bsg,where <br /> Ilow concentrations suggest that 80 feet bsg Is close to the dissolved plume's vertical extent The <br /> anticipated limited overall effectiveness and reliability of IAS technology to remediate the impacted <br /> soil and ground water require a re-evaluation of this proposed method t <br /> AGE conducted aground water extraction pumping test on 18 October 2001 Analysis of the ground <br />' water extraction data Indicted that ex-situ ground water treatment was feasible The radius of <br /> influence generated by a pumping rate of five gallons per minute was interpreted to be adequate to <br /> control further off-site migration of contaminants toward the east, in the predominantly down- <br /> gradient direction The results of the pumping tests were reported in the AGE-prepared Ground <br /> Water Extraction Pilot Test Report dated 31 January 2002 <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.