My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
1347
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544667
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2019 2:34:33 PM
Creation date
7/17/2019 11:13:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0544667
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004962
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON 90342 (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
1347
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14716030
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1347 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ij <br /> Project Number: SFB-175-0204.72 <br /> Consultant Project Number: 203-175-3289 <br /> Contract Number; N46CWCO244-9-X <br /> Facility Number: 9-0342 <br /> Work Order Number: D001760 <br /> f Report Issue Date: February 8, 1990 <br /> QA Conformance Summary <br /> Purgeeble Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> as Gasoline in Soil <br /> EPA Method 8020/8015 <br /> .s <br /> 1.0 Blanks <br /> Five of 5 target compounds were below detection limits in the reagent water blank and reagent <br /> methanol blank as shown in Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> it <br /> "2.0 Independent OC Check Sample g <br /> The control limits were met for 4 out of 4 OC check compounds as shown in Table 3. <br /> X3.0 Surr ate Compound Recoveries <br /> Percent recovery limits were met for the surrogate compound (naphthalene) for all samples as <br /> shown in Table 4. <br /> .1 <br /> 4.0 Matrix Spike MS and Matrix S ike Duplicate MSD Accuracy and Precision <br /> 4.1 Percent recovery limits were met for 4 of 4 compounds in the MS and MSD as shown in Table 5. <br /> 4.2 Relative percent difference (RPD) criteria was met for 4 of 4 analytes in the MS and MSD as <br /> shown in Table 5. u <br />� a <br /> 5.0 SaMple Handling s <br /> 5.1 Sample handling and holding time criteria were met for all samples. <br /> 5.2 There were no exceptional conditions requiring dilution of samples. <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> i <br /> i h <br /> � a <br /> a <br /> i� <br /> li <br /> .L <br /> ; GTEL Concord, CA Page 3 of 7 <br /> }D001760.00C <br /> GTE L <br /> EN V R N M E N T A L <br /> LABORATORfES, INC. <br /> tl � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.