Laserfiche WebLink
16. <br /> Project Number: Sis-175-0204.72 <br /> Consultant Project Number: 203.175.32!9 <br /> Contract Number: Nd4=244-9-% <br /> Facility Nudber: 9-0342 <br /> York order Muster: 0001760 <br /> Report Issue Data: February 8, 1990 <br /> DA Conformance Summary <br /> Purgsable Aroastles and Total Petroleum Hydroc■rbons <br /> as Gasoline in Sail <br /> EPA IMthod 8020/8015 <br /> 1.0 llgnks <br /> –� Five of 5 target eats were below detection limits in the reepmt rater clank and reagent <br /> amethanot bISFA as shown in Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> 2.0 indeaerdent o[ Check-mrale <br /> The control limits were eat for 4 out of 4 CC check coVOunds as shwa in Table 3. <br /> 3,0 surrogate C0000w:r±d R�erneeri s <br /> Percept recovery limits were met for the surrogate cntpwni (naphthalene) for all samples as <br /> shown in Table 4. <br /> 4.0 Vtri,,_§Dlkt MS and matrix Ike RuPticate JMSQ1 A 'rs Pre i i <br /> 4.1 Percent recovery limits were met for 4 of 4 conpouds in the xS and MSD as shown in Tsble 5. <br /> 4.2 Relative percent difference (APD) criteria was net for 4 of 4 analytes in the MS and MSD as <br /> 'tea <br /> shown in Table 5. <br /> wr 5.0 Sainte Handling <br /> 5.1 5anple handling and holding time criteria were net for all samples. <br /> r.. <br /> 5.2 There were no exceptional conditions requiring dilution of seeFplis. <br /> I <br /> i <br /> 3 <br /> t� GTEL Concord, CA Page 3 of T <br /> D0D1760.00C <br /> m�EL <br /> FAL <br /> . ® "AmOm AVOWS' INC - <br /> I , <br /> RM .. - .. <br />