Laserfiche WebLink
9. � M- `1 <br /> Project Vuebar: U11-M-0204.72 <br /> Conaultant Project Itusber: 203-175-32x9 <br /> Contract iitvb*r: M46CWCO244.9•X <br /> Facility Rwaber: 9-0342 <br /> Work Order Neer: 0001760 <br /> Report [Daae Date: February S. 1990 <br /> iA Conf oramance SM-ry <br /> Purgeebte Aromatics and Totat Petroleum Nydrocerbons <br /> = a 0ssaline In Soil <br /> EPR Kethod 8020/8015 <br /> 1.0 BtREIks <br /> Five of 5 to ket cOmPourds as sh in Tabtase2amid 2b ion limits in the reagent ester blsnic and reagent <br /> i <br /> 2.a l.,d�nendenc oC ch�%_SEMI <br /> Thi cprtral limits were met for 4 out of 4 cC check eonpounds as shown In Table 3. <br /> 3.0 S rr R ries <br /> kxa <br /> Percent recovery limits were wet for the surrogate carpotsx! (n+,'>f+ttw+lane) for sit aeerples as <br /> shown in lable 4. <br /> Ka rix ik D f • NSD c r nd Pr i on <br /> 4.0 Matrix Spike N - <br /> 4.1 recovery in the KS and K50 as shown in Table 5. <br /> Percent recove limits were met for 4 of 4 eaepawxeds <br /> 4.2 Relative Percent difference (RPD) criteria was met for 4 of 4 analytes In the KS and NSD as <br /> shown in Tabte S. <br /> 5.0 �amo[e Nandl� _ <br /> _ # 5.1 Sanple hardlin9 and holding time criteria were met for all smples. <br /> 5.2 There were no exceptional corditions requiring dilution of sarptes. <br /> i! <br /> 6 <br /> &7 <br /> I <br /> Page 3 of T <br /> GTEL Concord, CA <br /> 01101760.0DC GT E L . <br /> INvlomMINVAL <br /> LAB Oem A701113,IMC- - <br /> y <br />