Laserfiche WebLink
Y. ,. Mlt:l <br /> Projectusber: iFp-1.75-0204.72 <br /> Cotnultant Project :umber: 203-175.3299 <br /> Centreert (t4dCJCDiG4.9-x <br /> d !luab <br /> Foci IIty Ms=ber: 9-0342 <br /> Uork Order Number: COMM <br /> Report Issue Date: March 16, t990 <br /> OA Conformance Summery <br /> Purgaabie Aromoties and Total Petroleos Hydrocarbons <br /> as Gasoline in SOIL <br /> EPA Method U20/9015 <br /> 1.0 Blanks <br /> sive of 5 target compounds were below detection Limits In the reagent water blaolc and reagent <br /> sethanot blanc as shora in Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> 2.0 [ndeoerdent OC Check Semaie <br /> The control limits were met for 4 out of 4 OC check aasrpouTds as shown in Table 3. <br /> 3.0 Surngate CM20ind Reigyrrlesz <br /> Percent recovery limits were stet for the surrogate caapowd (naphthalene) for 10 of 12 gavel*$ <br /> as $hewn in Table 4. <br /> t <br /> 4,0 Maui: bike <br /> (MS) &Dd Netrlx Spike Duplicate (NSr,) Arcura L dL _Pt f44 <br /> Percent recovery limits were met for A of 4 conpouds In the MS and NSD as shown in Table S. <br /> 6. 4.2 Relative percent difference (RPD) criteria was met for 4 of 4 arulytes in the NS and MSD as <br /> sh-wn in TaMe 5. <br /> 3 <br /> 5.0 Seaple Randti <br /> ar9 <br /> 5.1 Salsple handling mrd holding time criteria were met for all samples. <br /> 5.2 There were no exceptional corditiors requiring dilution of samples. <br /> f.a E <br /> i ! <br /> t� F <br /> j <br /> *"f 6TEL Caneord, CA Page 3 of 7 <br /> p003117.DOC <br /> GT0itiL <br /> : <br /> 1ll Y 110 N Mt NTAi j - - <br /> w .... IMI LAlalAToelts. Iy1C.. <br />