Laserfiche WebLink
ME <br /> T <br /> Proini N 9175-0204.72 <br /> C�onzuU og=tz 175-3m <br /> M=Itlacl Nurnte,,' N45CW=44-1;-X <br /> Facit,ty Nvrnbg.'-- S-OM2 <br /> Wort Order Numb*r' D003M <br /> Report 11601 WC APM M IOW <br /> CIA Conformance Summary <br /> Purgeable Aromatic$and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> as Gasoline In Soil <br /> EPA Method 8020/6015 <br /> 1.0 "n <br /> Five of target compounds were below detection limits in the reagent water blank and reagent <br /> methanol blank as shown in Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> 2.0 W&40 �h- m <br /> The control limits were met for 4 out of 4 CC check compounds as shown In Table 3. <br /> V) <br /> compound(naphthalene)for all samples <br /> Percent recovery limits were met for the surrogate <br /> as shown in Table 4. <br /> 'inn <br /> �.R5M)AccuraiCY-a-Mi Praniz <br /> 4,0 Matrix 5121E <br /> 4.1 Percent recovery limits were met for 4 of 4 compounds inthe IVISand MSD asshown inTable <br /> 5. <br /> ia was mel for 4 of 4 analytes In the MS and MSD as <br /> 4.2 Relative percent difference(RPD)criter <br /> Shown in Table 5. <br /> 5.0 $ample Han"lin <br /> 5.1 Sample handling and holding time criteria were rnei for all samples. <br /> 5.2 There were no exceptional conditions requiring dilution of samples. <br /> —--------- <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> GTEL Concord,CA <br /> the <br /> DWZ.B98.DCC GTC L <br />