Laserfiche WebLink
WIN <br /> +r r '-' .. ....� _ <br /> w <br /> r. <br /> MEN <br /> Mr.Clint Rodgers <br /> ,«. February 22, 1991 <br /> Page 2 <br /> GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSES <br /> Following monitoring on January s, 1991,the three wells were purged by hand bailing to allow for the <br /> collection of representative groundwater samples. <br /> Standard Operating Procedure SOP 9 describes the Groundwater Technology purging and sampling <br /> procedure(Appendix A). Wells were purged with a clean polyvinyl-chloride(PVC), hand-held bailer until <br /> s three well volumes of water had been removed. None of the wells bailed dry. The purged water from all <br /> wells was put Into 55-gallon steel drums,labeled,and stored on the north side of the site pending proper <br /> i disposal. <br /> 1 <br /> After allowing the water to recover to at least 80 percent of the original levels,groundwater samples <br /> were collected In accordance with Groundwater Technology SOk 9, 10,and 12(Appendix A). The <br /> samples were placed in acidified 40-milliliter(mQ glass vials which were capped with TefianR septa lids <br /> so that no air was trapped Inside. The sample vials were then labeled and placed In an Insulated cooler <br /> for transportation to Superior Analytical Laboratory,Inc.,a State of Caiifomla-c erfified laboratory In <br /> f Martinez,California Proper Chain-of-Custody Manifest documentation,as described In SOP 11,was <br /> maintained with the samples,and a copy of the manifest is Included In this report(Appendix A). <br /> 3 <br /> All groundwater samples were analyzed for the presence of benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylenes <br /> F (BTEC,and for total petroleum hydrocarbons(TP!-1)-as-Baso}ine using modified U.S.Environmental <br /> Protection Agency(EPA)Methods 5030/8020/8015. Additionally,the groundwater sample collected <br /> ' from monitoring well MW-1,which Is ed)acent to the location of the former waste-oil tank,also was <br /> analyzed for volatile organics using EPA Method 8240. Na volatile organics were detected at the <br /> Method Detection Limit(MDL). Analytical results for benzene and Teri-as-gasoline are presented on <br /> Figure 4 and summarized in Table 2 The laboratory report Is enclosed In Appendix A. <br /> $; Analytical results Indicate that groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3 <br /> contained detectable concentrations of TPH-as-gasoline (180 parts per billion Ippb)and 380 ppb, <br /> respectiv*). A concentration of 18 ppb benzene was detected In the sample from monitoring well Mw- <br /> 3. No detectable amounts of TPHi-as-gasollne or BTEX compounds were found In the sample from <br /> k monitoring well MW-2. <br /> In summary,groundwater elevatlons In the three monitoring wells have decreased an average of <br /> approximately 3 feet from August 1990 to January 1991. Additionally;the groundwater gradient has <br /> changed from northwest to northeast and flattened from 0.02 to 0.002 across the site. These effects <br /> may be due to changes In groundwater well pumpage in the Stockton area <br /> Concentrations of TPH-as-gasoline were detected In samples from two monitoring wells.MW-11 and <br /> MW-3- <br /> The <br /> W 3.The next round of monitoring and sampling for this site Is scheduled for April 1991. Addltlonal well <br /> Installation Is delayed pending the result of the planned BAT probe study at Chevron Service Station <br /> No.9-4275. <br /> GROUNDWATER <br /> TECHNOLOGY.INC. <br />