Laserfiche WebLink
—,i <br /> S E C0 R <br /> 7 0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> This Site Conceptual Model was meant to summarize site activities and provide a guide for <br /> 1 future assessment and remediation Figure 20 presents a graphical interpretation of the general <br /> conceptual site model The following conclusions result from the above collection of data <br /> • Petroleum hydrocarbons detected in soil and groundwater during the removal of USTs, <br /> product lines, and dispensers in 1999 and subsequent site investigation resulted from <br /> operations of gasoline USTs and associated piping and dispenser at the site The <br /> ' majority of hydrocarbons in soil are in the area of the former dispensers to depths of 80 <br /> feet bgs <br /> x <br /> • Well surveys for the site and an adjacent LUFT site indicated that the nearest supply <br /> ' wells are approximately 1,500 feet northeast (well could not be field verified and may not „ <br /> exist) and 2,000 feet east of the site at the Stockton State Hospital <br /> • The vertical extent of benzene, MtBE, and 1,2-DCA in soil has been delineated to . <br /> nondetect levels and low levels of TPHg ' <br /> ,�Ss <br /> • Monitoring and sampling performed at the site since 2000 indicates the presence of <br /> ' TPHg, benzene, MtBE, and 1,2-DCA dissolved in groundwater beneath the site with a r <br /> majority of the dissolved mass in the B monitoring zone The extent of TPHg, benzene, ' <br /> and MtBE in groundwater cross and downgradient of the site are defined in the B r <br /> . monitoring zone 1,2-DCA is not delineated in the B monitoring zone <br /> • TPHg, benzene, MtBE, and 1,2-DCA impacts to groundwater in the A monitoring zone at <br /> N <br /> the Former 76 Station appear to be affected by upgradient ARCO service station 4932 <br /> ' • Initial groundwater analytical results for samples collected from the C monitoring zone <br /> wells indicate elevated levels of TPHg (reported as GRO), benzene, and 1,2-DCA <br /> Exposure to contaminants associated with petroleum hydrocarbons adsorbed to soil and ;¢, <br /> dissolved in groundwater at the site is depicted in Figure 20 Potential exposure medium <br /> include the following groundwater, soil, and air Groundwater is typically only encountered <br /> ' during monitoring well gauging, groundwater sampling, and well installation Soil is typically only <br /> encountered during well installation or on-site excavation Despite the presence of asphalt at <br /> the site, air (ambient) may be encountered via cracks in the asphalt surfaces should the site be <br /> ' redeveloped Figure 21 presents an exposure pathway model, depicting sources responsible <br /> for potential exposure and potential pathways of exposure <br /> x � <br /> Based on the above information SECOR would recommend the following _ <br /> The site should continue to be sampled on a quarterly basis to confirm groundwater ; <br /> concentrations and to determine plume stability in the A, B, and C zones n' <br /> Isoconcentration maps for TPHg, benzene, MtBE, and 1,2-DCA in all three zones should <br /> be included in future quarterly monitoring and sampling reportsw <br /> MW-15, MW-16 and MW-17 will be added the current quarterly monitoring and sampling <br /> ' program SECOR recommends the wells be monitored and sampled for at least three <br /> quarters in order to determine the validity of the initial analyses Any recommendations <br /> for additional assessment will be considered at that time <br /> Updated SCM 2005 doc 17 A <br /> ' 77CP 64409 05 0005 <br /> �m <br />