Laserfiche WebLink
ReFort on Additional Site Assessment 6 <br /> 7-E,even Inc.,Store#19976, 1399 N.Main St.,Manteca,California March 5,2001 <br /> 3.4 Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation/Surveying <br /> Groundwater monitoring well MW-7 was installed on November 1, 2000 (Figure 2). The groundwater <br /> monitoring well was constructed of 2-inch-diameter, Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride casing with flush <br /> threads, and 0.020-inch-slot well screen. The well is screened from 15 feet to 30 feet below grade. <br /> Sand occupies the annular space from the bottom to about two feet above the top of the well screen. <br /> The sand pack is sealed with about 2 feet of bentonite pellets saturated in place with neat-cement grout <br /> to about 10 inches below grade. The wellhead is protected at grade by a locking,water-tight well cap <br /> ane a traffic-rated street box(with watertight bolted lid) set in concrete. Well construction details are on <br /> the drill log (Appendix A). <br /> The top of casing and rim of the new well box was surveyed by Morrow Surveying for horizontal position <br /> anc elevation relative to mean sea level datum on January 5,2001 (Appendix B). <br /> 3.5 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> Quarterly gauging information was collected by measuring depth to water in each well to the nearest 0.01 <br /> fool from the top of the well casing, using an interface probe. All wells were sampled except well <br /> M"'-7,which had not been installed as of the date of the quarterly sampling event. Field data sheets are <br /> incl.tded in Appendix C. Potentiometric surface maps for the quarter were prepared using the <br /> groundwater elevation data (Figures 3 and 3A) (Table 3). <br /> Pricr to groundwater purging, dissolved oxygen was measured in each well using a field instrument. <br /> Dissolved oxygen data generally indicate mainly anearobic conditions, possibly due to intrinsic <br /> biodegradation. Dissolved oxygen readings range between 7.1 milligrams per liter(mg/L) in well MW-4, <br /> located upgradient of the dissolved hydrocarbon plume,to between 0.3 and 0.9 mg/L in the other wells <br /> (Taole 3). <br /> Sutsequent to monitoring, approximately four well volumes of water were removed from each monitoring <br /> well to ensure stabilization of pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature. The purge water was stored in <br /> D07-approved 55-gallon drums. The groundwater samples were collected using disposable bailers, <br /> then transferred to 40-milliliter glass vials filled to zero headspace and acidified to a pH of 2. The <br /> samples were sealed using Teflon&septum caps, labeled, placed on ice in an insulated container, and <br /> transported under chain-of-custody to a state-certified laboratory. The groundwater samples were <br /> analyzed for BTEX, and TPH-G using EPA Methods 8020/modified 8015, and for TBA, MTBE, DIPE, <br /> ETRE, and TAME by EPA Method 8260 (Table 3). <br /> 10079 ACA <br />