Laserfiche WebLink
k • <br /> Additional Site Assessment Report and Work Plan for Additional Subsurface Investigation 2 <br /> The Southland Corporation,Store#19976,1399 N Main St,Manteca,California June 5,1998 <br />' using the same protocol and analyzed for the some parameters as the samples collected beneath the <br /> USTs <br />' 3.0 ASSESSMENT WORK <br /> 3.1 Permitting/Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan <br />' Fluor Daniel GTI conducted a technical review of all relevant information provided prior to proceeding with <br /> site assessment work Following a complete review of site conditions, Fluor Daniel GTI prepared a <br /> site-specific Health and Safety Plan as required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration <br /> (OSHA)Standard"Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response"guidelines(29 CFR <br /> 1910 120) The document was reviewed and signed by all Fluor Daniel GTI personnel and subcontractors <br /> prior to commencement of work at the site <br />' 3.2 Soil Sample Collection <br /> On April 29, 1998, Fluor Daniel GTI supervised the advancement of three geoprobe points(GP-1 through <br />' GP-3) near the underground storage tank(UST) pad and pump island (Figure 2) Using a truck-mounted <br /> hydraulic drill and direct push techniques,discrete soil samples were collected from each of the soil <br /> bonngs Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals beginning at 5 feet below grade <br /> Each core was collected in a 2-foot-long by 1.25-inch-outside-diameter stainless steel sampling barrel lined <br /> with 1-inch-diameter by 2-foot4ong acetate tube insert Geoprobe point,GP-2 was cored continuously to <br />' 25 feet below ground surface(BGS)and then discrete sampled at 5-foot intervals to 45 feet BGS After <br /> being driven to the required sampling depth,the lead drive point of the core sampler was released and the <br /> sample barrel was pushed an additional two feet to collect the soil sample Following sample collection, <br />' the sampling barrel and drive rods were removed from the probe hole and the soil samples were removed <br /> from the sampling sleeves and used for soil descriptions One sample sleeve from each sample location <br /> was retained for laboratory analysis The drive rods and tools were triple rinsed with Alconox detergent and <br />' distilled water between bore holes,and all sampling equipment was cleaned between each sampling <br /> interval to reduce the potential for cross-contamination <br />' The soil from the cores was screened for hydrocarbon vapors using a flame ionization detector(FID) Soil <br /> was logged using the Unified Sod Classification System by a Fluor Daniel GTI field geologist working under <br /> the supervision of a California registered geologist(Appendix A) One 6-inch-long sleeve was collected <br /> from the 2-foot-long sample tube at each sampling interval,sealed with tape, labeled and placed on ice in <br /> an insulated container for transport under chain-of-custody manifest to Core Analytical Labs In Anaheim, <br />' California for analysis Field notes are included as Appendix B <br /> A total of 19 soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis for benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and <br /> total xylenes(BTEX), methyl-tert-butyl-ether(MTBE), and total petroleum hydrocarbons-as-gasoline <br /> 1"76„r q* <br />' s <br /> FLUOR DANIEL CTI <br />