Laserfiche WebLink
Quick-n-Save #2 - 3 - .. August 30, 2011 <br /> Site History/Assessments <br /> The Site has been an active gas station since at least the 1990's. In November 1999, fuel <br /> hydrocarbons were detected during a tank removal. To date, three monitoring wells have been <br /> installed and monitored regularly. A Site map showing the location of the current and former <br /> USTs, monitoring wells and groundwater level contours is provided at the end of this summary. <br /> Remediation Summary <br /> • Free Product: MW3 has contained product sheen as recently as January 2010 <br /> • Soil Excavation: An estimated 522 cubic yards of impacted soil were removed and <br /> disposed offsite in 2000 <br /> • In-Situ Soil Remediation: Soil vapor extraction, conducted from May 2011 through <br /> present, 88 pounds of TPHg removed at a rate of 2.5 pounds/day <br /> • Groundwater Remediation: No groundwater remediation has been conducted <br /> General Site Conditions <br /> • Geology and Hydrogeology: The Site is underlain by interbedded and intermixed sand, <br /> silt and clay. The depth to groundwater varies seasonally between 24 to 33 feet bgs and <br /> the groundwater gradient is predominantly east at approximately 0.007 feet/foot. No <br /> water wells have been identified within 2000 feet of the site. <br /> • Groundwater Trends: There are more than seven years of groundwater monitoring data <br /> for this Site. The extent of the groundwater plume has not been defined. MTBE trend is <br /> shown below, source area (MW-1) <br /> METHYL-TERT-BUTYL ETHER(MTBE)Results for MW1 <br /> 800000 <br /> 700000 <br /> 800000 <br /> SOOOOU <br /> 400000 <br /> �300000 <br /> 200000 •�•• <br /> 100000 <br /> O <br /> 01 <br /> .� METHYL-TERT-BUTYL ETHER(MTBE) TrMd <br /> Sensitive Receptor Survey <br /> A Sensitive Receptor Survey (SRS) is not noted in Geotracker. <br /> Risk Evaluation <br /> A Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) has not been conducted. <br /> Recommendation <br /> September, 2010, the Fund concurs with the San Joaquin County LOP that active remediation <br /> should commence without delay and that the extent of contamination should be defined <br /> concurrently with active remediation. <br />