Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Wayne Dietz July 14, 2008 <br /> 2154 S . El Dorado Street Investors, a California Limited Partnership Page 4 of 8 <br /> custody procedures and delivered to SunStar Labs a state accredited laboratory in Tustin, <br /> California. <br /> Following the completion of groundwater sampling, temporary well casing were removed and <br /> the borings were backfilled to grade with tremie pipe and a grout mixture of neat cement with <br /> 5% bentonite. The sampling equipment used repeatedly at the site was decontaminated on-site <br /> between groundwater samples to minimize the likelihood of cross-contamination. <br /> Investigation derived waste (IDW) such as drill cuttings, groundwater sampling purge water and <br /> some miscellaneous sample equipment decontamination rinse water were containerized in four <br /> (4) DOT certified 55-gallon drums pending necessary profiling and disposal. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SCREEENING LEVELS <br /> ROKEN determined that Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs)4 developed by the California <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region are most appropriate for <br /> evaluation of groundwater conditions at the site. The ESLs are considered to be conservative. <br /> Under most circumstances, and within certain limitations, the presence of a chemical in soil, soil <br /> gas or groundwater at concentrations below the corresponding ESL can be assumed to not pose a <br /> significant, long-term (chronic) threat to human health and the environment. Additional <br /> evaluation is usually necessary at sites where a chemical is present at concentrations above the <br /> corresponding ESL. Active remediation may or may not be required depending on site-specific <br /> conditions and considerations. <br /> The development and presentation of ESLs are modeled after similar documents published by <br /> the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE 1996), the Massachusetts Department <br /> of Environmental Protection (MADEP 1994) and the Netherlands (Vetger 1993). Screening <br /> levels for groundwater consider the following criteria: <br /> 1 ) Protection of human health <br /> • Current or potential drinking water resource <br /> • Emission of subsurface vapors to building interiors <br /> 2) Protection of aquatic habitats (discharges to surface water) <br /> 3) Protection against nuisance concerns (odors, etc.) and general resource degradation. <br /> Screening levels for groundwater and surface water are summarized in the F series of tables. For <br /> the purpose of developing Tier 1 screening levels, it is assumed that all groundwater could at <br /> some point in time potentially discharge to a body of surface water. Discharge could occur <br /> through natural processes (e.g. , natural discharge of groundwater to a stream, river, lake, <br /> wetland, bay, etc. via springs) or through human activities (e. g., pumping and discharge of <br /> groundwater at remediation or construction dewatering projects). <br /> Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, California Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, INTERIM FINAL—November 2007 (Revised May 2008). <br />