Laserfiche WebLink
2315 1 <br /> 3 5 E Dorado,Stockton <br /> Page 2 <br /> The two sets of monitoring wells proposed furthest from the site on Hampton and Adam Street: <br /> MW-9,MW-109,MW-209,and MW-11,MW-111,MW-2110,respectively,are not approved. These <br /> three proposed wells are located at 140 feet,310 feet,and 280 feet from MNV-3,which is the well I <br /> with the historically highest levels of contamination. EHD does not believe that sentinel wells at <br /> these distances are necessary at this time given the information currently available. <br /> i <br /> The inferred groundwater flow direction has been consistently to the east. EHD approves the <br /> proposed location for the installation of MW-10,MW-110,and MW-210 cluster east of the site,-and <br /> the locations for the installation of MW-7,MW-107,M%V-207 cluster north of the site,and MW-12, <br /> MW-112,MW-212 cluster south of the site. Instead of installing these 9 monitoring wells in 9 <br /> separate borings in 3 locations,EHD strongly recommends that you consider installing 3 multi- <br /> chambered wells (MCW)instead. The casing of an MCW is capable of housing up to 7 different <br /> discrete screen sections of varying lengths. The number of wells needed could be reduced by <br /> incorporating three screen sections equivalent to the three proposed monitoring wells per MCW. <br /> Since the screen sections of a MCW are typically built on site,EHD also recommends obtaining a <br /> continuous core from the boring in order to provide the exact geological information for discrete <br /> screen section construction. Submit a brief work plan addendum reducing the above-discussed 9 <br /> monitoring wells to 3 MCWs if you agree to these recommendations. <br /> EHD requires the following conditions be met: <br /> 1) EPA Method 8260 must be used to analyze groundwater samples from all new wells <br /> for 5 oxygenates, 1,2-DCA,EDB,and ethanol. <br /> 2) Collect additional VOAs of samples from all impacted monitoring wells. Effort <br /> must be made to lower the detection limits. Previous detection limits of analyses <br /> for MTBE and other oxygenates were often set at level as high as 250, 500,even <br /> 5,000µg/l. Primary Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for MTBE in drinking <br /> water ektablished by California Department of Health Services is 13 µg/1,and the <br /> Secondary MCL is 5 µg/1. <br /> 3) The geological/ hydrological model should be refined with the new acquired data. <br /> 4) Implement approved portion of the work plan by November 17,2002. Submit a <br /> report of findings to EHD by January 17,2003. <br /> 5) EHD strongly recommends that use of hollow stem auger to complete the <br /> installation of monitoring wells and collect soil samples be attempted before going <br /> to mud rotary. <br /> Portions of the work plan not approved maybe implemented at a later time if justified based on <br /> concentrations detected or migration of the contamination. A work plan addendum stating reasons <br /> and data sufficient to approve and implement these portions of the work plan may be submitted to <br /> EHD at such time. <br /> Donna Heran,REHS,Director <br /> i <br /> Environmental Health Department t <br /> Jeffrey REHS--J Nuel C. Henderson,Jr.,RG <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV LOP/ Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> Cc: CRWQCB,Central Valley Region—Marty Hartzell <br /> Cc: Geological Technics,Inc. -Raynold I.Kablanow <br /> i <br />