Laserfiche WebLink
Stephen L. Valentine -4- March 16, 2010 <br /> Claim No. 417 <br /> C. Groundwater Trends: <br /> • Benzene trendsare.shown below <br /> v BENZENEf Results for MW 3 <br /> l <br /> F f f i <br /> 25000h <br /> [ t <br /> 20000 <br /> c <br /> A <br /> s.r 3 <br /> 15000; <br /> x. <br /> E z. <br /> — <br /> 0000 <br /> 7 <br /> 5000 V ¢ s <br /> z <br /> x BENZENE TrBntl k ' <br /> y <br /> VII. SENSITIVE_RECEPTOR SURVEY: four wells identified within Y2 mile of the site <br /> VIII. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION'FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description: retail gasoline station <br /> B. Site History: the extent of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> C. Groundwater Monitoring Summary: strong monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: dual phase extraction <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> F. Recommendation: <br /> In March 2008, the Fund made the following recommendation: The Fund <br /> recommends that the San Joaquin County LOP direct the Responsible Party to <br /> continue to operate the groundwater remediation system and maximize as <br /> necessary, to achieve Water Quality Objectives in a timely manner. The Fund <br /> will review this site next year to track progress. <br /> UPDATED, March 2009: The Fund concurs.with the Sacramento County LOP <br /> that active remediation should continue. The Fund will review this site next year <br /> to track progress. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Z4 RecydaPaper <br />