Laserfiche WebLink
Potential Risk of Indoor Vapor Intrusion <br /> There may be need for further discussion regarding what constitutes an "active""service station". <br /> Our opinion is described below: <br /> • Active Service Station <br /> ➢ We classified this property as having an active service station operating on it. <br /> ➢ We classified this property as active since an auto service&repair facility is currently <br /> operating on the site.The business currently stores, handles,uses and disposes of <br /> petroleum based products. <br /> ➢ Internal combustion engines are currently used in the service bays. <br /> ➢ The service bay doors are open during business hours,so operational fumes and outdoor <br /> traffic fumes are constantly exchanged inside the services bays. <br /> ➢ The office door is open to both the outdoors and to the services bays during business , <br /> hours. <br /> • Given the facility operational parameters described above,the fact that this facility does not <br /> dispense gasoline for auto fueling purposes seems to be irrelevant or incidental at best. <br /> • If by definition -to qualify as an"active service station requires dispensing of petroleum <br /> fuels,than this facility would not qualify. <br /> • However, since they use petroleum products,cleaners,solvents, and operate internal <br /> combustion engines inside the building, these sources far exceed the minor concern of <br /> possible indoor air intrusion from gasoline soil vapors. Weconclude that the current use of <br /> the facility qualifies this site as an"active service station". <br /> Time Needed for the Groundwater to Reach Maximum Containment Levels(MCL's) <br /> In order to determine the time needed for groundwater to reach MCL's, GZA plotted the benzene <br /> concentrations reported in various wells as a function of time, indicating that the contaminant <br /> distribution can be represented by a first order decay function with attenuation rates ranging from - <br /> 0.0004 to -0.001 (Figures I thru 6). Applying the decay function forward in time results in an <br /> estimate to reach the clean up goal of I Ng/I for benzene by October 2071, or if implementing a safety <br /> factor of 30% by May 2094(Tables 1 thru 6). It is important to note that this is an estimate, based on <br /> information known at the time of preparing this report and conservative assumptions, and actual time <br /> to reach groundwater quality goals may differ. First order decay rates and the time to reach MCLs <br /> were calculated for the following wells: MW-5,MW-3,MW-8, MW-108, MW-6 and MW-I. <br /> MW-5 <br /> Historically, MW-5 has been the most contaminated shallow depth well at the site. If we plot the <br /> natural log of benzene concentrations reported in MW-5 (from September 1999 forward) as a <br /> function of time, we see that the contaminant distribution can be represented by a first order decay <br /> function with an attenuation rate of k = -0.001 per day and an R2 value of 0.6084 (Figure I &Table <br /> 1). Applying the decay function forward in time results :in an estimate to reach the clean up goal of l <br /> pg/I for benzene by May 2026. <br /> If a factor of safety of 30% is applied to this estimate to accommodate for the low R2 value, then it is <br /> anticipated that the groundwater cleanup goal of 1 pg/I for benzene will be reached by May 2034. <br /> MW-3 <br /> Historically, MW-3 has been the most contaminated intermediate depth well at the site. If we plot the <br /> natural log of benzene concentrations reported in MW-3 (from July 1996 forward) as a function of <br /> t <br />