Laserfiche WebLink
Gealogica17eC"CS lnc Page 5 <br /> ' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> • May 15, 2002 <br /> • Figure 6 illustrates TPH-G and Benzene concentrations versus elevation in deep well <br /> ' MW-101, which lies near the core of the plume The concentrations are approaching <br /> stability The steep decline in the initial concentrations suggests that the contaminants <br /> detected in the well were initially a drilling artifact The low benzene concentration now <br /> ' detected (1 3 gg/1) is probably representative of the lower extent of the groundwater <br /> plume <br /> • Figure 7 illustrates the TPH-G concentrations in the shallow wells The high <br /> ' concentration in well MW-3 creates a localized node Additional investigation is <br /> needed to gain a more accurate site conceptual model <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Conclusions <br /> I The groundwater contaminant plume is not defined vertically or laterally <br /> 2 Groundwater flow trends to the northeast to east The southerly flow direction recorded <br /> ' on December 4, 2000, appears to be anomalous <br /> 3 High levels of BTEX and TPH-G are present in the groundwater of all six water table <br /> monitoring wells It is noted that the groundwater elevation exceeded the level of the <br /> well screens Low concentrations of BTEX and TPH-G are present in both of the deeper <br /> wells <br /> 4 Oxidation-Reduction Potential measurement (Table 4) shows that seven of the eight <br /> wells are screened in areas of the groundwater plume that are affected by the <br /> biodegradation reactions occurring within the plume Negative ORP values indicate that <br /> the wells are within the halo of reaction depleted water caused by biodegradation of the <br /> contaminants This corroborates well with the laboratory data <br /> Recommendations <br /> 1 Additionalroundwater monitoring wells are needed to define the lateral extent of the <br /> g g <br /> plume off site GTI proposes installing two well pairs (shallow and intermediate wells) <br /> MW-7/MW-107 & MW-8/MW-108 to the north and northeast of the site respectively — <br /> see Figure 2 for proposed well locations A deep well is also needed in the location of <br /> well MW-4 GTI proposes to install well MW-104 adjacent to well MW-4 to define <br /> further the up gradient plume Mr Jeff Wong of the San Joaquin County Department of <br /> Public Health/Environmental Health Division has indicated they soon will be issuing a <br /> directive for a work plan for further investigation <br /> 2 Continue quarterly groundwater monitoring, with the next monitoring event scheduled <br /> in June 2002 <br />' 3 Due to the infrequent detection of the oxygenated fuel compounds at this site, future <br /> quarterly monitoring events will not include analysis by EPA method 8260 However, <br /> testing for MTBE by 8020/602 is justified <br />