Laserfiche WebLink
' Grob ical T¢ckxicsl�u Page 4 <br /> g g <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> February 28,2005 <br /> ' wells on the northern portion of the Shell site contain low levels of TPH-G (110 - 2,500 <br /> ug/1) Since these monitoring wells are 50 feet deep, it is likely that the subject plume is <br /> ' diluted in these wells and mixing with shallower clean water The CMTrM well MW-108 <br /> is screened (4") at 52 feet bgs and it contains 6,010-ug/l TPH-G The Shell site report <br /> also indicates that the two wells in the southern portion of the site (near the existing <br /> ' USTs) have MTBE above the laboratory detection limits The two northern wells that lie <br /> along the subject site plume axis do not contain MTBE above the laboratory reporting <br /> limit (0 5 ug/1) This suggests that the Shell facility has an MTBE problem not related to <br /> tthe subject site Further delineation of the plume in this area may be warranted <br /> 3 The lateral extent of the groundwater plume is undefined down gradient of CMTrm well <br /> MW-8/108/108/308 A limned site investigation should take place to define the down <br /> ' gradient extent of the plume This should consist of direct push probe drilling methods <br /> such as CPTTM to collect discrete groundwater samples rather than installing additional <br /> monitoring wells <br /> 4 We recommend that interim remediation be considered before this plume migrates any <br /> further and the cost for cleanup continues to increase Interim remedial action can be <br /> ' initiated by installing a high vacuum dual phase extraction unit to address the on site <br /> contamination Extraction should be performed on the existing wells EW-1, VEW-1 & <br /> VEW-2 and a new extraction well set at a deeper depth The treatment system should <br /> include air stripping and carbon filtration of extracted groundwater to be discharged to <br /> City of Stockton public treatment works The placement of these components at the site <br /> will be problematic due to limited space <br /> 1 <br /> 4.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> 1 This report was prepared in accordance with the generally accepted standard of care and <br /> practice in effect at the time Services were rendered It should be recognized that definition <br /> ' and evaluation of environmental conditions is an inexact science and that the state or practice <br /> of environmental geology/hydrology is changing and evolving and that standards existing at <br /> the present time may change as knowledge increases and the state of the practice continues to <br /> ' improve Further, that differing subsurface soil characteristics can be experienced within a <br /> small distance and therefore cannot be known in an absolute sense All conclusions and <br /> recommendations are based on the available data and information. <br /> The tasks proposed and completed during this project were reviewed and approved by the <br /> ' local regulatory agency for compliance with the law No warranty, expressed or implied, is <br /> made <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />